Nuclear Weapons and Scientific Responsibility
C. G. Weeramantry
Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1999 - Law - 430 pages
Several years ago when this work first appeared, it had become apparent that scientists, who play such a key role in the nuclear enterprise, needed to be alerted to the many questions of conscience and legality that were inextricably interlinked with their work. These questions lay at the heart of the nuclear weapons problem, for whatever the political and military leaders might ordain, the manufacture of such weapons was a plain impossibility without the active assistance of the scientific profession. Yet no substantive work on this topic had until then been attempted. Such a work appeared at that time to be an urgent and important need. If the problem was then acute and serious, it is even more so now. The power of nuclear science has grown and with it has grown the power of the individual scientist to initiate new developments. The changes in the world order that have occurred in the intervening years enable individual scientists to hold themselves out as available for employment. Those who seek their expertise may include not only governments but other entities as well. The power of global destruction that these scientists command renders it imperative that they be alerted on a continuing basis to the problems of conscience that arise. Hence the need for a re-issue of this work, for which there had been many requests from concerned scientists, professional groups, socially concerned organisations and also from lawyers. The book is re-issued in its original form but updated by the inclusion of more recent work as contained in extracts from three judicial opinions upon the matter.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
The Cold War
The Distinctiveness of Nuclear Weapons
The Origins and Current Status of
Is the Use of Nuclear Weapons Illegal?
Is the Manufacture of Nuclear Weapons Illegal?
Unilateral Scientific Abstention
Consequences of the Thesis advanced in this Book
APPENDIX A The Nuclear Winter according to Lord Byon 1816
Einsteins Letter to Roosevelt 1939
A Statement in Support of
a New Zealand v France
c General Assembly Advisory Opinion
PRELIMINARY OBSERVATIONS ON THE OPINION OF THE COURT
The Responsibility of the Scientist
The Principle of Foreseeability
Some Ideological Objections
The importance of a clarification of the
Other editions - View all
accepted action activity already apply argument arms aspect Assembly attack authority become body bomb cause Charter civilization concept concern consequences consideration considered constitute context Convention countries Court crime damage danger defence destroy destruction deterrence discussion effects environment environmental existence explosions fact force further future global Government Hiroshima human rights humanitarian law illegality important individual interests international law involved issues knowledge limited major material matter means military missiles nature Nobel Prize nuclear war nuclear weapons object obligations observed opinion particular party peace political population possible present principles problem produce prohibition protection question race radiation radioactive reasons referred regard relation Report resolution responsibility result rules scientific scientists situation Soviet space specific suffering tests threat tion Treaty United Nations universal violation Wars Zealand