Page images

Population. Consumption, lbs.

Population. Consumption, lbs. 1850... 23,200,000 27,858,482 1856... 28,000,000 33,622,306 1851...

24,000,000 28,819,120 1857... 28,800,000 34,582,943 1852... 24,800,000 29,779,756 1858... 29,600,000 35,543,580 1853...

25,600,000 30,740,394 1859... 30,400,000 35,875,805 1854... 26,400,000 31,701,033 | 1860... 31,445,089 30,162,335 1855... 27,200,000 32,661,668 1861... 32,245,089 30,010,022

These figures show the continued increase in the consumption of tea per head in the United States, during a period of great prosperity, in which tea has been free of duty. The events of the present year may be expected to produce a great change, not only by the decline of general business, but in consequence of the war taxes levied on tea. The tariff act of July, 1861, imposed fifteen cents per pound duty.

This circumstance gave rise to a large speculative movement, which resulted in an advance of some four or five cents per pound.

The impulse given by the new tariff was, however, checked by the disaster that, about that time, befel the Union arms in Virginia, and for a while business was prostrate; but towards the end of August the advices received from China proved wholly unpromising with reference to shipments of green teas, and this fact, coupled with that of the rapid reduction of the stock in market here, served to further enhance their value. The advance initiated by the new duty continued during the remainder of the year, and under its influence, as well as that of a constantly diininishing stock, green teas reached a price unknown for many years ; certain qualities of gunpowder bringing as much as a dollar per pound. The duty was subsequently raised to twenty cents. The following are the highest and lowest figures of the year:



Jan., 1861. Dec., 1861. July, 1862 Green—Hyson ....cargo grade 37 @ 40 75 @ 82 80 @ 85 Young hyson

36 @ 40 73 @ 82 80 @ 83 Hyson skin..

30 @ 33 50 @ 53 50 @ 55 Twankay:

30 @ 33 50 a 53 80 @ 83 Gunpowder

38 @ 41 70 @ 78 Black-Oolong..

30 @ 32 55 @ 57 60 @ 63 Ningyong

30 @ 32 55 @ 57 Souchong..

23 @ 26 43 @ 45 Congou..

23 @ 26 43 @ 45 Ankoi..

16 @ 18 37 @ 40 In 1859 Japanese tea had just come upon our market, and there seemed to be a growing taste for it. The expectations of the trade have not been disappointed. This description of tea is now established in public favor, and the importation has increased from a mere nominal quantity, in 1859, to nearly half a million of pounds, the estimated receipts of the past year.

The value of the raw silk imported have been, of late years, as follows into the United States : $991,234 | 1859.

$1,619,157 953,734 1860.

1,780,140 1858. 1,510,195 1861..

1,411,416 The great change which present dificulties are producing in the values

1856.... 1857.

of raw materials for clothing, may impart an extra demand for Chinese silks, while it cheapens the opening market for American cotton.

The area of China is computed at 5,000,000 square miles, and the population 420,000,000. The Empire is divided into three parts for administration purposes, China Proper, Manchuina, and the Colonial Possessions. Central China, the flowery land and home of agriculture in that country, embraces near 2,000,000 square miles, one-third of which is classed with the best tillage lands of the world.

The Chinese are alive to the benefits of river steamers, and to the advantages which shipments on European vessels give in safety and certainty of insurance. The internal trade of China, aided by the unusual facilities derived from its water communication, ramifies over all the provinces, and is of inconsiderable magnitude. Junks, barges, and whole fleets of smaller boats cover its canals and rivers, the tonnage of which is said not to be exaggerated in equalling it with the combined tonnage of all other pations! The coasting trade is comparative small, and is much impeded, not only in dangers of navigation along a coast frequently visited by storms of terrific violence, but by bands of pirates, who roam about almost with impunity, and make an easy prey of defenceless traders. The Chinese merchant calculates to lose one venture in three. He now avoids the risk by freighting in foreign bottoms, and this throws a large amount of trade into American hands, other than the direct trade between the two countries. It is evident that with the opening facilities for intercourse, that the American river steamboats penetrating into the vast network of rivers, which command the production of so many millions of industrious persons, have an immense future before them. A considerable number of steamboats has already been sent out to China in the course of the last few years from New York, Boston, and San Francisco, and so far as heard from, with extremely profitable results. A number more are now being fitted out for the same adventure, one or two at New York, but particularly at San Francisco, and it is thought that a large number could follow them with abundant profit to their owners. The extent of country drained by the Chinese rivers thrown open to trade, as well as the disposition of the Chinese to band over their transport trade to foreigners, opens out an amount of employment for steamers which in the distant future may far exceed that afforded this class of vessels in the Mississippi valley

In one of the last China papers it is stated that on the Yang-tse-Kiang there were twenty-four steamers, of which nineteen were English and five American. A San Francisco paper learns that six are building in England specially for that trade, and that some disposition exists on the part of the English government to avaii itself of the call for steamers in the China market to dispose of some old gunboats. There are also steamers building in England for a line between Shanghae and the ports of Japan.

It is computed that during the rebellion epidemic, now prevailing in China, one million of junks and boats have been destroyed, most of which were on the rivers and canals which feed the great basin of the Yang-tseKiang. The operation of steamboats is, it is well known, to shorten the time of transportation, and, by so doing, to virtually double the capital and stimulate the productions of all regions. What may not, therefore, be expected from their influence upon the million of boats in the great and rich basin, to which a foreign demand for its commodities is just imparting new life.




By the territorial census of 1849, the population of the Territory of Minnesota, embracing what is now Dakota, was 4,780. Of this number, the returns show 723 for settlements now outside of the State, leaving the population of the State as now bounded, 4,057. The United States census of Minnesota Territory for 1850, showed a population of 6,077. Subtracting therefrom the number given the previous year for Dakota, not otherwise ascertainable, the result for the State, as now bounded, would be 5,354.

The following table, then, exhibits the growth of population in Minnesota for ten years, within the limits of the present State: Authority,

Number. 1849_Territorial census.

4,057 1850—United States census.

5,354 1857_Territorial census....

150,037 1860—United States census.

172,022 TABLE OF VOTES. The following table exhibits the increase of the vote at the general elections for Territorial and State officers, and taking into account the degree of excitement and other circumstances attending each election, is valuable as showing the ratio of votes to population, and affording a basis for future calculations :

No. of No. persons August, 1849..

682 5.94 September, 1851

1,208 October, 1853

2,845 October, 1855

7.944 October, 1857


4.24 October, 1859

38,917 November, 1860...

34,743 4.95


to one vote.


The table of population shows a ratio of increase of 56 per cent yearly, from 1849 to 1857, and of less than 5 per cent yearly, from 1857 to 1860.

The table of votes shows an increase of 60 per cent yearly, from 1851 to 1857; of 112 per cent yearly, from 1855 to 1857, and a slight decrease from 1857 to 1860.

The swell and subsidence of the wave of population at the different periods above indicated, mark three well defined phases in the progress of the population of our State.

1. In the years immediately following 1850, the gold discoveries of California diverted immigration from the northwest, and moreover, until 1853 and 1854, the whole of that portion of Minnesota, west of the Mississippi River, was in the occupancy of the Sioux Indians. For these reasons population did not set rapidly towards Minnesota in 1854.

2. Accordingly, the table of votes shows that it was between 1854 and 1857 that the chief immigration to Minnesota took place. Over 100,000

Ratio of anincrease. nual increase.

were added to the population of Minnesota between the fall of 1855 and 1857, nearly trebling in two years. This extraordinary influx of population, with its accompanying exaggeration of property values, and wild riot of financial adventure, constitute this period one of the most remarkable in the history of the age, and is not likely to be repeated in the experience of our State.

3. The effect upon immigration of the violent reaction which followed, is shown in the halting pace of population between 1857 and 1860, when the increase was only 22,000 in number, or about 7,000 yearly, of which over 6,600 yearly, or about 19,828 for the three years, were the natural increase by birth, reducing the immigration for the period to about 2,000.

The census was taken at a period when the country was just recovering from the exhausting financial calamities of 1857. In the overflowing barvests of that year a new climacteric of recuperated commercial life was reached—a new period of healthy and vigorous growth was entered on, and now, notwithstanding the gloom of civil war which overhangs the nation, emigration has been pouring in with a new impulse.

The following table shows the absolute yearly and relative increase in the several periods above noted:

Increase for Annual

the period. 1849....

4,057 1850..

5,350 1,293 1,293 31.6 1855, estimated

50,000 44,650 8,930 166.9 1857..

150,037 100,037 -50,018 100.0 1860.

172,022 21,985 7,328 14.9 INCREASE COMPARED WITI OTHER STATES. The increase of population in Minnesota in the first decade of its settlement, has been far geater relatively than that of any other State of the Union, in the corresponding period of growth.

A tabular comparison would occupy too much space, but it will suffice to say that of the Western States starting about the year 1800 or 1810, with about the same population as that of Minnesota in 1850—Michigan, Indiana, and Illinois—were each from 20 to 28 years in reaching the population attained by Wisconsin or Iowa in about 15, and by Minnesota, in 10 years. This fact strikingly illustrates the influence of improved modes of communication in promoting emigration to the West.

The following table will show the movement of population in eight States of the northwest in the last decade, as compared with Minnesota : Population Population

Increase Minnesota...

5,330 172,022 166,692 3,127 Iowa ...

192,214 674,948 482,734 251 Wisconsin

305,391 775,873 470,472 154 Illinois..

851,470 1,711,753 860,283 101 Micbigan. 397,654 749,112 251,458

88 Indiana... 988,416 1,350,479 362,063

36 Ohio..

1,980,329 2,339,599 359,270 18 Kansas..

107,110 107,110

Actual increase.



per cent.

Total .....




The increase in all the free States was 5,450,916, so that the increase in the north western States was 58 per cent, or nearly three-fifths of the whole free growth. Minnesota contributed about five per cent, or onetwentieth of the northwestern increase, about three per cent, or onethirty-third of the whole free growth, and about two per cent of the entire national gain.

The whole northwest gained in the ratio of 67 per cent over 1850. Minnesota gained 31 fold or 3,127 per cent.

Minnesota has thus grown in the last ten years more than twelve times as rapidly as any of the northwestern States, and nearly fifty times as rapidly as the average growth of all of them.

This is not, however, a fair comparison, as the geometrical ratios of increase are of course greater in the first stages of growth. It will be a better illustration to say that Minnesota shows a more rapid growth in the last ten years, than the most rapidly growing States in the period of their most rapid growth, as the following comparison will show:

Rates of increase per cent. Minnesota, from 1850 to 1860...

3.127 Wisconsin, from 1840 to 1850.

891 Iowa, from 1840 to 1850.

Michigan, from 1830 to 1840.

from 1800 to 1810...

Indiana, from 1810 to 1820.

510 Minnesota, by this showing, has grown 3 times as fast in the last ten years as the most rapidly growing State of the Union, in the most rapid period of its growth; six times as fast as the average of the fastest States, and one hundred times as fast as the average increase of the whole Union.

COMPARATIVE INCREASE BY BIRTH AND IMMIGRATION, It is interesting to trace the respective shares which the collateral agencies of birth and immigration have contributed to our population. The representative population of the State, as it stood on June 1st, 1860, was derived from the following general sources: Number of persons born in Minnesota....

Number of persons born out of the State, but in
the United States....

Number of persons born in foreign countries.. 57,502

Whole number of immigrants.
Number not classified....



[ocr errors]

Total representative population...

172,022 Increment of Births.—The number of persons born in Minnesota, then, is nearly one-fifth, or 18.8 per cent of our whole population. Of this number there were born before the census of 1850... 1,334 Born in the ten years ending June 1, 1860....

30,912 The births in the last decade being 18.5 per cent of the whole increase of the decade.

The bearings of this fact will not be fully appreciated without recollecting that five-sevenths of our population have been acquired since

« PreviousContinue »