Children and the Law: Child vs. state, Volume 3
Janet W. Steverson
Taylor & Francis US, 2002 - Law - 414 pages
Annotation This is the third volume in the three volume collection i Children and the Law /i . Volume three, i Child v.s. State /i, explores the rights of children against the state. Areas treated in this volume include freedom of speech, (the restriction of newspapers, music, arm-bands, etc.) the right of a minor to refuse medical treatment, and a minor's right to contraception and abortion with ad without parental consent. This volume also includes the rights of minors to separate from their legal parents; the rights of children to know their biological parents in the case of adoption; and the rights of children resisting repatriation to relatives outside the United States.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Carey v Population Services International
Abortion Rights of Minors Parental Consent
The Pregnant Childs Right to SelfDetermination
Go to the Mall with My Parents?? A Constitutional Analysis of
Curfew Laws Freedom of Movement and the Rights of Juveniles
Hutchins v District of Columbia
Other editions - View all
abortion accompanying activity adolescent adoption adults allow Amendment analysis Appeals applied argued authority Bellotti best interest burden bypass challenge child City Clause CODE concern consent considered constitutional contraceptives crime curfew laws decision determine discussing District due process effect established evidence exists fact federal finding freedom fundamental right Health held holding Hutchins important individual interest involvement issue Judge judicial Justice juvenile curfew legislative liberty limited Mall of America mature means Minnesota minor movement obtain opinion parental consent parental notification person physician Planned Parenthood plurality pregnancy present procedure prohibition protection question reasonable recognized regulation requirement restrictions result right to travel risk rule scrutiny seeking Senate Servs sexual speech standard statute Supp supra note Supreme Court teenagers teens Texas tion treatment United violated young