Proposed Amendments to Federal Transportation Laws: Hearings, Eighty-seventh Congress, Second Session on S. 3242...[and] S. 3243U.S. Government Printing Office, 1962 - Highway carriers |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 100
Page 45
... traffic at less than cost and thereby imposing undue burden on noncompetitive traffic for losses on the low - rated traffic . Unreasonably low rates have disas- trous effects on business and commerce of the country and are injurious to ...
... traffic at less than cost and thereby imposing undue burden on noncompetitive traffic for losses on the low - rated traffic . Unreasonably low rates have disas- trous effects on business and commerce of the country and are injurious to ...
Page 86
... traffic is passenger traffic ; a relatively small volume of air traf- fic is freight traffic . So that we are talking about quite different things when you are talking about permission to compete with mini- mum rates in hauling grain or ...
... traffic is passenger traffic ; a relatively small volume of air traf- fic is freight traffic . So that we are talking about quite different things when you are talking about permission to compete with mini- mum rates in hauling grain or ...
Page 143
... traffic from regulation as to the minimum rates could foster rate wars on such traffic , and the freight charges thereon could be driven down to rock bottom , perhaps below out - of- pocket costs . This could occur within a short period ...
... traffic from regulation as to the minimum rates could foster rate wars on such traffic , and the freight charges thereon could be driven down to rock bottom , perhaps below out - of- pocket costs . This could occur within a short period ...
Page 150
... traffic free from ICC minimum rate controls regardless of whether or not , in given situations , the traffic in ques- tion was actually moving by presently exempted carriers . For illustration , it is probably correct to say that today ...
... traffic free from ICC minimum rate controls regardless of whether or not , in given situations , the traffic in ques- tion was actually moving by presently exempted carriers . For illustration , it is probably correct to say that today ...
Page 153
... traffic from regulation as to minimum rates could foster rate wars on traffic and the freight charges thereon could be driven down to rockbottom , perhaps below out - of - pocket costs— this is on page 5 : This could occur within a ...
... traffic from regulation as to minimum rates could foster rate wars on traffic and the freight charges thereon could be driven down to rockbottom , perhaps below out - of - pocket costs— this is on page 5 : This could occur within a ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
agencies agricultural commodities air carriers amended antitrust laws apply authority barge bargelines bill BROSNAN bulk commodities carriage cents Chairman charges Civil Aeronautics Board Clayton Act committee common carriers competing Congress court discrimination economic effect eliminate enactment exemption fares Federal Federal Aviation Act forms of transportation Government grain GRINSTEIN haul highway increase Interstate Commerce Act Interstate Commerce Commission joint board joint rates legislation LOEVINGER LOOMIS low-cost carrier ment miles minimum rate control minimum rate power minimum rate regulation modes of transportation motor carriers MURPHY national transportation Ohio operations out-of-pocket costs passenger percent portation present President problem proposed provisions question rail rates ratemaking reasonable regulatory revenue River Robinson-Patman Act Senator BUTLER Senator HARTKE Senator LAUSCHE Senator MONRONEY Senator THURMOND Sherman Act shippers statement tank truck tariff testimony tion ton-miles traffic trans transportation system U.S. Senate water carriers