The Metaphysics of Death
John Martin Fischer
Stanford University Press, 1993 - Philosophy - 423 pages
This collection of seventeen essays deals with the metaphysical, as opposed to the moral issues pertaining to death. For example, the authors investigate (among other things) the issue of what makes death a bad thing for an individual, if indeed death is a bad thing. This issue is more basic and abstract than such moral questions as the particular conditions under which euthanasia is justified, if it is ever justified.
Though there are important connections between the more abstract questions addressed in this book and many contemporary moral issues, such as euthanasia, suicide, and abortion, the primary focus of this book is on metaphysical issues concerning the nature of death: What is the nature of the harm or bad involved in death? (If it is not pain, wha is it, and how can it be bad?) Who is the subject of the harm or bad? (if the person is no longer alive, how can he be the subject of the bad? An if he is not the subject, who is? Can one have harm with no subject?) When does the harm take place? (Can a harm take place after its subject ceases to exist? If death harms a person, can the harm take place before the death occurs?) If death can be a bad thing, would immorality be a desirable alternative? This family of questions helps to fram ethe puzzle of why--and how--death is bad.
Other subjects addressed include the Epicurean view othat death is not a misfortune (for the person who dies); the nature of misfortune and benefit; the meaningulness and value of life; and the distinction between the life of a person and the life of a living creature who is not a person. There is an extensive bibiography that includes science-fiction treatments of death and immorality.
What people are saying - Write a review
Rationality and the Fear of Death
The Evil of Death
The Misfortunes of the Dead
Why Is Death Bad?
Death and the Value of Life
Steven LuperFoy 267
Some Puzzles About the Evil of Death
WellBeing and Time
actual affairs affect alive answer argue argument assume attitudes become believe benefits better bias born cause claim comparative concept concern condition consider continuing course dead death depends deprivation desires died dies discussion dying earlier Epicurean Epicurus equal evaluation evil example exist experience explain fact fear feel future give given going ground happen harm idea imagine important indifferent individual interests involves irrational kind later least less living longer look loss matter mean merely misfortune momentary months moral Nagel natural never nonexistence object occurs one's pain particular past perhaps person philosophers pleasure possible posthumous prefer present problem question rational reason regard relation Requirement result seems sense simply someone sort suffering suggest Suppose sure temporal theory things thought thwarted tion true welfare well-being worse wrong York