« PreviousContinue »
ON THE LAW OF
WITH OR WITHOUT CAPITAL STOCK,
AND OF ALL THE
VARIOUS VOLUNTARY UNINCORPORATED ASSOCIATIONS
CHARLES FISK BEACH, JR.,
OF THE NEW YORK BAR
AUTHOR OF “CONTRIBUTORY NEGLIGENCE," "COMMENTARIES ON THE LAW
AND BEACH'S RAILWAY DIGEST," AND
CORPORATION LAW JOURNAL."
IN TWO VOLUMES.
HON. THEODORE W. DWIGHT LL. D.
WARDEN OF THE
LAW SCHOOL OF COLUMBIA COLLEGE
LUMINOUS INSTRUCTION EXTENDED THROUGH A LONG
SERIES OF YEARS
AN UNCOUNTED MULTITUDE OF YOUNG MEN
HAVE BEEN EDUCATED IN THE LAW
AND FROM WHOSE HAND IN 1881
THE AUTHOR RECEIVED HIS OWN CALL TO THE BAR
UPON A BRANCH OF
THAT SCIENCE IN WHICH HE IS PROFOUNDLY LEARNED
HE HAS SO LONG TAUGHT WITH SUCH CONSPICUOUS SUCCESS
IN TESTIMONY OF THE AUTHOR'S ESTEEM AND
SENSE OF PROFESSIONAL INDEBTEDNESS
CORDIALLY AND RESPECTFULLY
In these volumes I have attempted to include all the law of private corporations, whether with or without capital stock, of joint-stock companies, and of all the various so-called quasi-corporations and voluntary unincorporated associations which exist for any private purpose. The scope of the work is therefore somewhat wider than that of any other with which I am acquainted. I have proposed to myself the task of making a treatise which shall cover the entire field of private company law in all its details, using the term "private companies ” in its widest modern sense, and I have studiously undertaken not to omit the law, as declared in the decided cases or defined by statute, of any sort of an association which passes for a corporation or a company, aside from partnerships, on the one hand, and municipal corporations on the other.
The subject has been approached from the point of view of the corporation itself — in the belief that this is the true angle of incidence for a comprehensive treatment of the law — rather thạn from that of the share-owners or the officers of the corporation. Such a stand-point has regard to the perspective of the subject, which serves to justify it in theory; and it preserves the proportion of the work and enables the writer to avoid, on the one hand, a partial or one-sided treatment, and on the other a magnified or top-heavy discussion of any branch of the general subject, which should seem to justify it from a practical point of view. I have not attempted a treatise on the law of Ultra Vires, or of Stock and Stockholders, or of Officers and Agents, but have tried to write the law of private corporations. One may well, as a theorist, regard the stockholders as in some sort the corporation, and their rights and liabilities as those of the company, and a theoretical treatise can be written from that conception of the subject; but in practice every lawyer knows that the perplexing ques