One Gospel From Two: Mark's Use of Matthew and LukeDavid B. Peabody, Allan James McNicol, Lamar Cope One of the key questions that motivates scholars in New Testament studies is the Synoptic Problem the relationship between Matthew, Mark, and Luke as they tell roughly the same story about the life and work of Jesus. For years, scholars have argued that the Gospel of Mark was the first Gospel produced, and that Matthew and Luke borrowed their materials from Mark, and a few additional sources. In Beyond the Impasse of Markan Priority, a follow-up to their Beyond the Q Impasse, David Peabody and his co-authors offer a dissenting voice, and demonstrate why they believe the Gospel of Mark is dependent on Matthew and Luke. While this argument is not a new one, this book provides the first detailed textual analysis to make the point definitively. Pericope by pericope, the authors examine and retell the story or teachings contained therein to highlight the dependence of Markan features on those of Matthew or Luke or both. This retelling is followed by observations that highlight structural, compositional, and thematic features of the pericope. The analysis concludes with a focus on literary details such as Markan additions to the texts of Matthew and Luke, Markan changes to the texts of Matthew and Luke, and evidence of fragmentary preservation of Matthew and Luke in the Markan text. David B. Peabody is Professor of Religious Studies at Nebraska Wesleyan University, Lincoln. Lamar Cope is Professor of Religious Studies and Chair of the Department of Religious Studies at Carroll College, Waukesha, Wisconsin. Allan J. McNicol is Professor of New Testament at the Institute of Christian Studies in Austin, Texas. |
Contents
THE TWO GOSPEL HYPOTHESIS 1754 | 17 |
THE PROVENANCE AND PURPOSE OF MARK 5563 | 55 |
115 6881 | 69 |
PART TWO JESUS CALLS DISCIPLES PREACHES AND CASTS OUT DEMONS | 82 |
2066A 117152 | 117 |
6B826 | 155 |
271052 | 193 |
1316 | 218 |
58 | 264 |
913 | 266 |
The Appearance of the Horrible Desecration Mk 131423 | 268 |
2427 | 270 |
2831 | 271 |
3237 | 273 |
111 | 276 |
SUMMARY 235279 | 279 |
1731 | 219 |
3234 | 225 |
3545 | 227 |
4652 | 229 |
4652 | 231 |
SUMMARY | 234 |
11411 | 235 |
WITH CHART E MARKS CHRONOLOGY OF THE PASSION WEEK | 236 |
110 | 239 |
The Replacement of the Temple Leadership Mk 11111237 | 241 |
2733 | 247 |
112 | 248 |
1317 | 251 |
1827 | 253 |
2834 | 254 |
3537a | 257 |
Watch Mk 1237b1411 | 258 |
4144 AS SECONDARY TO LUKE 1214 | 261 |
14 | 263 |
1216820 280343 | 281 |
1725 | 283 |
THE SECONDARY CHARACTER OF MARK TO MATTHEW IN THE ACCOUNT OF THE LAST SUPPER | 284 |
2631 | 288 |
3242 | 291 |
4352 | 295 |
5372 | 297 |
147 | 304 |
615 | 306 |
1621 | 309 |
2232 | 311 |
3341 | 315 |
CONCLUSION 344347 | 344 |
THE LINGUISTIC ARGUMENT AND THE SYNOPTIC PROBLEM 354382 | 354 |
MORE STRUCTURAL AND LINGUISTIC ELEMENTS | 383 |
THE GREEK WORD πάλɩ AGAIN USED | 389 |
408 | |
424 | |
Common terms and phrases
According Acts addition agreement appears argument beginning Bethsaida characteristic Christian close coming common comparable composition conclude conflation context continues critical crowd David death dependence describe detail disciples discussion Document earlier early Edited elements evidence example explain expression faith four give going Gospel Hypothesis hand healing History immediately important indicates instance introduction Jerusalem Jesus John kingdom later linguistic literary Luke's Mark as Composer Mark's Markan material Matthean Matthew and Luke messianic secret narrative Observations occurs omits parables parallel passage Peabody pericope Peter phrase present probably question reader reading reference represents resurrection saying scholars seems Sermon similar story structure Studies supplements synopsis Synoptic Synoptic Problem teaching temple theme tradition twelve understand unit University Press utilized verse καὶ
References to this book
Mark’s Other Gospel: Rethinking Morton Smith’s Controversial Discovery Scott G. Brown Limited preview - 2006 |