Page images

cluding the one on the Red River. Also may I call attention to the fact that, under the omnibus bill which contains identically the same provision that the Overton bill contains with respect tto reservoirs, the Conchas Reservoir in New Mexico was authorized, at a cost of 15 or 20 million dollars, and the Blue Stone Reservoir, in West Virginia was also authorized, and the Sardis was authorized. In other words, the Conchas and the Sardis are put on a relief basis, and authorized under that legislation.

Senator OVERTON. It is true that in conference it was agreed that since they had already been started, the work should be continued; it was agreed that the Sardis Reservoir, in the Yazoo Basin, should be continued, since it had been started.

Representative WHITTINGTON. Under the Overton bill, which I supported, about 270 million dollars was authorized. And if expended, the other portion of that money would have been expended in Louisiana, 23 million in the Eudora, and 20 to 40 million down the Atchafalaya. So the greater portion of the money would have been expended in Louisiana.

Mr. JACOBS. It is true, Mr. Whittington. But we would rather have that money expended creating other works, rather than creating the works in Louisiana.

Senator OVERTON. In other words, you would prefer, if it were possible to do so, to have the floodway down the Yazoo Basin?

Mr. Jacobs. I would approve 500 million, to have a floodway down the Yazoo, rather than to have anything done to the Eudora.

Representative WHITTINGTON. That is perfectly natural. But what would happen when the waters got back to the Mississippi, at Vicksburg?

Now, Mr. Jacobs, with respect to cooperating, is it not a fact that Arkansas and Mississippi Representatives cooperated with Louisiana to get the Federal Government to pay not only for the building of the levees along the tributaries of the Red, but for paying the cost of them after they were built?

Mr. JACOBS. Of course they approved it.

Representative WHITTINGTON. And is it not a fact that we supported and authorized the Government to acquire the rights-of-way to build the levees for the protection of Arkansas and Louisiana, along the south bank of the Arkansas?

Mr. Jacobs. Mr. Whittington, without the full cooperation of all those States, we would not have any flood-control works.

Representative WHITTINGTON. That is true. And we cooperated in the Bonnet Carre and the Morgan City spillway, did we not?

Mr. JACOBS. Yes.
Representative WHITTINGTON. That is fine.

Mr. JACOBS. But I do not think you gave the full cooperation that we should have had in the Bonnet Carre. The plans were originally for a larger amount being by-passed into Lake Pontchartrain than 250,000 second-feet.

Representative WHITTINGTON. No; my point is that I signed on the dotted line and did whatever you suggested.

Mr. Jacobs. You did. But there were a number of Mississippians who did not.

Representative WHITTINGTON. I am talking only about the Representatives here in Congress. And we did just what the chief of rivers and harbors suggested.

Mr. Jacobs. Yes, sir.

Senator BILBO. I want to make this observation: It is very essential that the Senators and Congressmen from the Mississippi Valley, having troubles among themselves, should iron out their differences in private, and that they should present a solid front. Because it is very essential that we all stand together. That is one reason I was trying to commit you on the Eudora.

Mr. JACOBS. I think you are entirely correct, Senator. And I fully agree with Mr. Whittington. I do hope that before I leave Washington this time, we shall be able to get together and work out something which will be beneficial to all of us and which will permit this work to go ahead and be completed while Congress is in a humor to give us an allowance to go ahead and complete it.

Senator BILBO. I remember that, before, we had a great deal of trouble making progress with this until the eastern flood came along; and then everybody became flood-conscious, and we got help.

Mr. JACOBS. That is right.

Senator Bilbo. And I want to point out the fact that I inaugurated the plan of the Federal Government's helping in the improvements.

Mr. Jacobs. You are right.

Senator BILBO. I did not think that one community should bear the burden, itself.

Mr. Jacobs. Exactly. Because it helps a number of adjoining States; and why should one community bear the burden of benefits that go to the adjoining States?

Senator BILBO. That is correct. I hope that policy is borne in mind by Congress.

Senator OVERTON (presiding). We are very much obliged to you, Mr. Jacobs.



Senator OVERTON (presiding). Mr. J. R. Adams. And is there anyone here from Natchez, Miss.? Is anyone in attendance at the hearings from Natchez? (No response.) Representative WHITTINGTON. Senator Bilbo represents Natchez. Senator BILBO. I will take care of Natchez.

Senator OVERTON (presiding). They have expressed their views in two resolutions which have already been filed and will be printed in the record.

Mr. Adams, will you give your name?

Mr. ADAMs. My name is J. R. Adams. I am a member of the Board of State Engineers, Louisiana. I live at Lake Providence, La.

Senator OVERTON (presiding). Mr. Adams, will you introduce yourself to the committee by stating what your profession is and how long you have been engaged in it and what study you have made of the flood-control problems of the lower Mississippi Valley?

Mr. ADAMS. Mr. Chairman and gentlemen, I have been connected with the board of State engineers since July 1907. From July 1907 until 1924, I was an employee of the board of State engineers. In 1924 I became a member, and have since been engaged in flood-con


trol work on the Mississippi River and its tributaries in the State of Louisiana.

Senator OVERTON (presiding). Are you familiar with the bill we have under consideration?

Mr. ADAMS. Yes, sir. Senator OVERTON. And that is a bill to go ahead with the Morganza, without having to wait on the Eudora?

Mr. ADAMS. Yes, sir.

Senator OVERTON. I should like you to give the committee the benefit of your views in reference to this bill.

Mr. Adams. Senator, there has been so much said by so many here, today, preceding me, that I did not think it necessary for me to say very much. But I did want to say to you that we certainly endorse your amendment, S. 3354, separating the Morganza from the Eudora floodway, and express the hope that it will receive favorable consideration by this committee. It is meritorious, and necessary to control the floods in the lower river.

The separation of the Morganza from the Eudora is a proper thing to do under the existing circumstances; and it is a correct thing to do from an engineering standpoint. Seventy-five percent or more of the rights-of-way in the Morganza have been obtained, as has been stated here by several, while only a small percentage has been obtained in the Eudora. And it does not appear that the necessary options will be secured in the Eudora within a reasonably short time. Therefore we feel that the Morganza work should be proceeded with immediately, for the relief of the lower river; and therefore we endorse your bill.

Senator OVERTON (presiding). Is that all, Mr. Adams?
Mr. ADAMS. I think so, unless there are any questions.
Senator OVERTON (presiding). Are there any questions?

Senator Bilbo. Mr. Adams, you have no objection to the building of the Eudora spillway?

Mr. ADAMS. I would not say that I had any objection to it; no. I think if the Government had 75 percent of the options on it, they probably would be building it.

Senator Bilbo. It would be all right to get the land any way they can, wouldn't it?

Mr. ADAMS. So far as I am concerned, I am willing to leave that to the Army engineers.

Senator Bilbo. That is something that Congress has to attend to. Mr. ADAMS. Well, Congress, then.

Senator OVERTON. Mr. Adams, I tried that in the original Overton bill.

Mr. ADAMS. Yes; I know you did.

Senator OVERTON. And the Chief of Engineers and the War Department voiced their very stern opposition to condemnation of flowage easements in the Eudora floodway, because it would entail such an immeasureable responsibility upon the Federal Government.

Mr. ADAMS. Yes, sir.

Senator OVERTON. And in the report made in the last few days on a similar bill which was introduced by Senator Miller, the War Department and the Chief of Engineers again renewed their opposition, upon the same grounds.

Mr. ADAMS. Yes, sir. I think you would find, however, that the entire population throughout the district would be opposed to it.

Senator OVERTON. You say it is difficult to obtain 75 percent of the options. Do you know that it would be very difficult to condemn all of the flowage easements of lands necessary?

Mr. Adams. It would be far more difficult; yes. Certainly it would.

Senator OVERTON. There would either have to be a voluntary transfer of the flowage easements or condemnation of the flowage easements covering 822,037 acres of land?

Mr. ADAMS. Yes, sir.

Senator OVERTON. That land is held by numerous landowners, is it not?

Mr. Adams. Oh, yes, indeed. Yes. So much of the land down there, and the plantations in Louisiana in particular, has been cut up in recent years and has been sold in 40-, 60-, and 80-acre tracts, and cut up in small portions. I have no idea how many owners there are in there; but I know there are a great many in East Carroll Parish, alone.

Senator Bilbo. It has been the policy of Congress heretofore to condemn lands for the building of roads, spillways, reservoirs, and so forth, has it not?

Mr. ADAMS. I have never known of the condemnation of land for the building of levees.

Senator OVERTON. Do you happen to know whether or not they have finished with the condemnation proceedings in the Birds PointNew Madrid spillway?

Mr. ADAMS. No, sir; I do not know. The last I knew of it was that they were still going on with that. I was up in that floodway and there were still a good many people up in there.

Senator OVERTON (presiding). I think that is all, Mr. Adams.



Senator OVERTON (presiding). The next speaker will be Mr. Wade Martin. Will you give your full name to the reporter, please?

Mr. MARTIN. My name is Wade 0. Martin, of St. Martinville, La.

Senator OVERTON. What position do you hold in connection with flood control?

Mr. MARTIN. I am chairman of the Louisiana Flood Control and Water Conservation Commission.

Senator OVERTON. How long have you been interested in floodcontrol problems of the Mississippi Valley?

Mr. MARTIN. All my life.

Senator OVERTON. Now, Mr. Martin, we have under consideration this bill to separate the Morganza from the Eudora. You are familiar with the provisions of the bill, are you not?

Mr. MARTIN. Yes, sir.

Senator OVERTON. The committee would be very much obliged to you if you would give us the benefit of your information and views in reference to that bill.

Mr. Martin. Mr. Chairman and members of the committee, when I was arranging the map that is pinned on the wall, I was separating the map about at the line between Arkansas and Louisiana, so that I could

see the

refer to the map and so that you could have the benefit of being able to

map. I was born and raised in the Atchafalaya Basin. And before the. Civil War, what is now considered a worthless swamp and what is now a floodway was inhabited and cultivated. The act of 1928 created the Atchafalaya spillway. No provision in that act was made for any payments in the Atchafalaya spillway. The Overton Act of 1936 provided payments for flowage rights down to approximately the latitude of Krotz Springs, which is just above where the main Atchafalaya levees end—the small upper part of the Atchafalaya Basin. No provision is made for payments of this big Red River backwater area just at the head of the Atchafalaya Basin. No provision is made for payments from the approximate latitude of Krotz Springs down to the Gulf, which is a very large area. In the event of a superflood, all the water coming from the upper reaches of the river and the tributaries must meet right here at the top of the Atchafalaya Basin-floods from the Ohio and the upper Mississippi and the Arkansas and the Red and all of the other tributaries must meet at the head of the Atchafalaya River. At that point they have to divide. Under the adopted plan, a million and a half second-feet are supposed to go down the long route to the Gulf, and the Atchafalaya Basin must be prepared to carry the other half--a million and a half second-feet, this short way to the Gulf.

Our lands, which were previously improved and cultivated, along the Atchafalaya River and its tributaries, are now increasingly flooded. Due to the building of levees along both banks of the Mississippi and along the tributaries, the floods in the Atchafalaya Basin have increased to such an extent that our lands had to be abandoned. We consider, down there: “Our lands have been confiscated by floods, and now being in this floodway, they are dedicated to floods". But we knew that that was necessary, and we did not object.

Changed_conditions have forced us to come back, in 1936, and amend the Jadwin 1928 act. We organized a little steering committee, of which I had the honor to be the chairman, composed of men from Louisiana and representative men from Mississippi and from Arkansas; and we worked along with Senator Overton and the congressional delegations from Mississippi and Arkansas, and with the Army engineers, until we thought we had finally found the solution to the whole problem. And that consisted of a great deal of work in different areas, but principally the construction of a Eudora floodway and a Morganza floodway. At that time the floodways were linked. We need not go into the details of how they were linked, because that has been thoroughly discussed. We did not object to that, because we could see no objection at that time. We thought it would be only a matter of a few months and the options would be obtained and the work would proceed. In that, we have been disappointed.

Now, you will notice that this south Louisiana area is in acreage as large if not larger than that section we have referred to as north Louisiana. As chairman of the Flood Control Committee of Louisiana, I am just as much interested in protecting the upper half as I am the lower half. At this present time, I know what to do to protect the lower half, but I do not know what to do to protect the upper half. And so, in behalf of the people of Louisiana, I am here to ask this committee to amend the Overton bill so as to permit the construc

« PreviousContinue »