Social Constructivism and the Philosophy of Science

Front Cover
Psychology Press, 2000 - Philosophy - 170 pages
1 Review
Social constructionists maintain that we invent the properties of the world rather than discover them. Is reality constructed by our own activity? Or, more provocatively, are scientific facts constructed? Is everything constructed? This is a discussion of the philosophical issues that arise out of this controversial debate, analysing the various strengths and weaknesses of a range of constructivist positions. The author argues that contemporary philosophical objections to constructivism are drastically inconclusive, while offering and developing objections. He shows that the strongest constructivist arguments still suffer from conceptual difficulties, illustrating the divide between the sociology and the philosophy of science through examples as varied as laboratory science, time, and criminality. Throughout, the book distinguishes between the social causes of scientific beliefs and the view that all ascertainable facts are constructed.

What people are saying - Write a review

Review: Social Constructivism and the Philosophy of Science

User Review  - Goodreads

Disappointing read - 1* Too heavy for a primary education degree. I picked up this book (electronically) to develop my understanding for my presentation on 'how children learn science?' I found it too ... Read full review

Other editions - View all

Common terms and phrases

About the author (2000)

Andre Kukla is Professor of Psychology and of Philosophy at the University of Toronto, Scarborough.

Bibliographic information