...supply one-half of the deficiency so recognized in addition to that provided in paragraph (d). (d) The States of the Upper Division will not cause the flow of the river at Lee Ferry to be depleted Iwlow an aggregate of 75,000,000 acre feet for any period of ten consecutive years reckoned in continuing...

...supply one-half of the deficiency so recognized in addition to that provided in paragraph (d). (d) The States of the Upper Division will not cause the...at Lee Ferry to be depleted below an aggregate of 75,000,000 acre-feet for any period of ten consecutive years reckoned in continuing progressive series...

...supply one-half of the deficiency so recognized in addition to that provided in paragraph (d). (d) The States of the Upper Division will not cause the...at Lee Ferry to be depleted below an aggregate of 75,000,000 acre feet for any period of ten consecutive years reckoned in continuing progressive series...

...supply one-half of the deficiency so recognized in addition to that provided in paragraph (d). (d) The States of the Upper Division will not cause the...at Lee Ferry to be depleted below an aggregate of 7;"i, 000,000 acre-feet for any period of ten consecutive years reckoned in continuing progressive...

...supply one-half of the deficiency so recognized in addition to that provided in paragraph (d). (d) The states of the Upper Division will not cause the flow of the river at Lee Ferry to be depleted helow an aggregate of 7."i.()iK).000 acre-feet for any period of ten consecutive years reckoned in...

...supply one-half of the deficiency so recognized In addition to that provided in paragraph (d). (d) The States of the upper division will not cause the...at Lee Ferry to be depleted below an aggregate of 75.000,000 acre-feet for any period of 10 consecutive years reckoned In continuing progressive series...

...supply one-half of the deficiency so recognized in addition to that provided In paragraph (d). (d) The States of the upper division will not cause the flow of the river at Lee Ferry to he depleted below an aggregate of 75.000,000 acre-feet for any period of 10 consecutive years reckoned...

...objection to the present allocation, were it not for this objectionable provision, which I will read : The States of the upper division will not cause the flow of the river at I/ee Ferry to be depleted below an aggregate of 75,000,000 acre-feet for any period of 10 consecutive...

...to supply one-half of the deficiency so recognized in addition to that provi in paragraph (d). (d) The States of the upper division will not cause the flow of the rive Lee Ferry to be depleted below an aggregate of 7.r>.000.000 acre-feet for period of 10 consecutive...

...Arizona unless it be found in the ambiguous language of paragraph (d) of Article III, as follows: " The States of the upper division will not cause the...at Lee Ferry to be depleted below an aggregate of 75,000,000 acre-feet for any period of 10 consecutive years reckoned In continuing progressive series...