...parallelism between the Supreme Court of the District and the Court of Appeals of the District, on the one hand, and the district courts of the United States...regarded as within federal jurisdiction, is complete. A question similar to the one we have here was presented in the case of the Steamer Coquitlam v. United...

...parallelism between the Supreme Court of the District and the Court of Appeals of the District, on the one hand, and the district courts of the United States...regarded as within federal jurisdiction, is complete." And see Pitts v. Peake, 50 F. (2d) 485. Whether the Railway Company has corporate power to operate...

...parallelism between the Supreme Court of the District and the Court of Appeals of the District, on the one hand, and the district courts of the United States...regarded as within federal jurisdiction, is complete." And see Pitts v. Peake, 50 F. (2d) 485. Whether the Railway Company has corporate power to operate...

...of of the District lof Columbia!, on the one hand, and the district courts of the United States ami the circuit courts of appeals, on the other, in the consideration and disposition of rasas involving what among the States would be regarded as within Federal jurisdiction, is complete."...

...of the 1)istriet lof (‘olumbial and the Court of Appealsd the District lof Columbial, on the one hand, and the district courts of the United States and the circuit ¿urts of appeals, on the other. In the consideration and disposition of cases involving what among...

...Court of the District [of Columbia] and the Court of Appeals of the District [of Columbia], on the one hand, and the district courts of the United States...regarded as within Federal jurisdiction, Is complete." See also to the same effect Clalrborne-Annapolls Ferry Company v. United States, 1932, 52 S. Ct. 440,...

...Court of the District [of Columbia] and the Court of Appeals of the District [of Columbia], on the one hand, and the district courts of the United States...regarded as within Federal jurisdiction, is complete." See also to the same effect Clarborne-Annapolis Ferry Company v. United States, 1932, 52 S. Ct. 440,...

...parallelism between the Supreme Court of the District and the Court of Appeals of the District, on the one hand, and the district courts of the United States...regarded as within federal jurisdiction, is complete." ' All that remained to finalize the transformation from the original Supreme Court of the District...

...Court of the District of Columbia and the Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia, on the one hand, and the District Courts of the United States...regarded as within federal jurisdiction, is complete."" By the Act of June 25, 1936" the court's name was changed to the 30. Act of Feb. 9, 1893, ch.74, 27...

...Court of the District of Columbia and the Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia, on the one hand, and the District Courts of the United States...would be regarded as within federal jurisdiction, is complete."32 By the Act of June 25, 193633 the court's name was changed to the 30. Act of Feb. 9, 1893,...