Private Truths, Public Lies: The Social Consequences of Preference FalsificationPreference falsification, according to the economist Timur Kuran, is the act of misrepresenting one's wants under perceived social pressures. It happens frequently in everyday life, such as when we tell the host of a dinner party that we are enjoying the food when we actually find it bland. In Private Truths, Public Lies Kuran argues convincingly that the phenomenon not only is ubiquitous but has huge social and political consequences. Drawing on diverse intellectual traditions, including those rooted in economics, psychology, sociology, and political science, Kuran provides a unified theory of how preference falsification shapes collective decisions, orients structural change, sustains social stability, distorts human knowledge, and conceals political possibilities. |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 31
... individual's influence on social outcomes , because preference falsifi- cation is an individual act . The mechanisms ... individual's capacity [ to influence the collective decision is likely to be 16 Living a Lie.
... individual's suscep- tibility to social pressure and the satisfaction he derives from truth- fulness . To treat a variable as given is not to assume , of course , that it cannot differ from individual to individual . People may bring to ...
... individual's expressive needs were to increase , his threshold would rise , because it would then take greater pressures to offset the expressive advantage of supporting 0 . Individuals differ in their psychological constitutions , and ...
Contents
Collective Conservatism | 105 |
The Obstinacy of Communism | 118 |
The Ominous Perseverance of the Caste System | 128 |
Copyright | |
10 other sections not shown