Private Truths, Public Lies: The Social Consequences of Preference FalsificationPreference falsification, according to the economist Timur Kuran, is the act of misrepresenting one's wants under perceived social pressures. It happens frequently in everyday life, such as when we tell the host of a dinner party that we are enjoying the food when we actually find it bland. In Private Truths, Public Lies Kuran argues convincingly that the phenomenon not only is ubiquitous but has huge social and political consequences. Drawing on diverse intellectual traditions, including those rooted in economics, psychology, sociology, and political science, Kuran provides a unified theory of how preference falsification shapes collective decisions, orients structural change, sustains social stability, distorts human knowledge, and conceals political possibilities. |
From inside the book
Results 1-2 of 2
... legalize postrevolutionary land seizures . The vocal oppo- nents of the bill sensed that deputies were reluctant to be identified as defenders of the rich . To make it easier to Institutional Sources of Preference Falsification 95.
... deputies indicate their preferences orally . His tactic worked , in that many deputies who had expressed serious reservations in private refused to be counted as opponents . The bill passed on a close vote.22 In many democracies ...
Contents
Collective Conservatism | 105 |
The Obstinacy of Communism | 118 |
The Ominous Perseverance of the Caste System | 128 |
Copyright | |
10 other sections not shown