Limitation of Venue in Certain Actions Brought Under the Employers' Liability Act: Hearings on S. 1567 and H.R. 1679. Jan. 7-9, 13-4, 19481948 - 299 pages |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 100
Page 2
... Federal courts against interstate common carriers by railroad for damages for wrongful death or personal injuries . It amends the Federal Employers ' Liability Act by remov- ing from sections 6 ( 45 U. S. C. 56 ) the provision ...
... Federal courts against interstate common carriers by railroad for damages for wrongful death or personal injuries . It amends the Federal Employers ' Liability Act by remov- ing from sections 6 ( 45 U. S. C. 56 ) the provision ...
Page 5
... Employers ' Liability Act constitutes a burden upon interstate commerce and ... Federal district , or in the court of the county , city , or district where ... Federal Employers ' Liability Act and transport them to far - distant places ...
... Employers ' Liability Act constitutes a burden upon interstate commerce and ... Federal district , or in the court of the county , city , or district where ... Federal Employers ' Liability Act and transport them to far - distant places ...
Page 6
... Federal and State laws . 2. In the event that the proposed course of action ... employers under exactly the same cir- cumstances as is the passenger who ... Federal and State courts . It must be appreciated that railroads operate their ...
... Federal and State laws . 2. In the event that the proposed course of action ... employers under exactly the same cir- cumstances as is the passenger who ... Federal and State courts . It must be appreciated that railroads operate their ...
Page 7
... Federal Employers ' Liability Act was first enacted in 1908. This act abolished the common - law defense of assumption of risk . It did away with the defense that an injured employee suffered injury or death as the result of negli ...
... Federal Employers ' Liability Act was first enacted in 1908. This act abolished the common - law defense of assumption of risk . It did away with the defense that an injured employee suffered injury or death as the result of negli ...
Page 15
... Federal Employers ' Liability Act of 1908 had no venue provisions and a plaintiff under that act was required to go to the place of incorporation of the defendant railroad , often hundreds of miles away . The litigation which arose ...
... Federal Employers ' Liability Act of 1908 had no venue provisions and a plaintiff under that act was required to go to the place of incorporation of the defendant railroad , often hundreds of miles away . The litigation which arose ...
Common terms and phrases
accident occurred action arose affiant ambulance chasers amendment American Bar Association ATHERTON attorneys bring suit Brotherhood of Railroad BRUNE burden carriers cause of action Chairman Chicago claim agent claimants committee Congress Cook County damages defendant DeParcq district court doctrine of forum E. H. Moore expense Federal courts Federal Employers filed forum non conveniens FREEHILL FREELS hearings hospital House Illinois Central Illinois Central Railroad injured employee interstate commerce JACKSON Jennings bill Judge Judiciary jurisdiction jury Justice Kepner lawsuit lawyers legal aid department legislation Liability Act litigation McDonald miles Minnesota operation passenger personal injury personal-injury plaintiff practice proposed racket railroad company railroad employees Railroad Trainmen Railway Labor Executives regional counsel Representative JENNINGS residence Senator DONNELL Senator LANGER Senator MCGRATH Senator MOORE settlement Sol Andrews solicitation statement subcommittee Supreme Court testimony THOMPSON tion transported trial unethical venue provisions venue statute verdicts witnesses
Popular passages
Page 51 - That he is the petitioner herein; that he has read the foregoing petition and knows the contents thereof, and' that the same is true of his own knowledge, except as to the matters therein stated to be alleged on information and belief, and as to those matters he believes it to be true.
Page 90 - The jurisdiction of the courts of the United States under this Act shall be concurrent with that of the courts of the several States, and no case arising under this Act and brought in any state court of competent jurisdiction shall be removed to any court of the United States.
Page 97 - Stirring Up Litigation, Directly or Through Agents. — It is unprofessional for a lawyer to volunteer advice to bring a lawsuit, except in rare cases where ties of blood, relationship or trust make it his duty to do so. Stirring up strife and litigation is not only unprofessional, but it is indictable at common law.
Page 111 - For the convenience of parties and witnesses, in the interest of justice, a district court may transfer any civil action to any other district or division where it might have been brought.
Page 119 - Brotherhood Railway Carmen of America International Brotherhood of Firemen and Oilers Brotherhood of Railway and Steamship Clerks, Freight Handlers, Express and Station Employees Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employees Brotherhood of Railroad Signalmen of America National Organization Masters, Mates, and Pilots of America National Marine Engineers...
Page 263 - It is a reproach to our civilization that any class of American workmen should, in the pursuit of a necessary and useful vocation, be subjected to a peril of life and limb as great as that of a soldier in time of war.
Page 2 - Under this act an action may be brought in a circuit court of the United States, in the district of the residence of the defendant, or in which the cause of action arose, or in which the defendant shall be doing business at the time of commencing such action. The jurisdiction of the courts of the United States...
Page 59 - VI treaties made under the authority of the United States, along with the Constitution and laws of the United States made in pursuance thereof, are declared the supreme law of the land.
Page 194 - In 1911 the committee on jurisprudence and law reform of the American Bar Association, of which Mr.
Page 265 - ... when its ordinary jurisdiction, as prescribed by local law, is appropriate to the occasion, and is invoked in conformity with those laws, to take cognizance of an action to enforce a right of civil recovery arising under the act of Congress, and susceptible of adjudication according to the prevailing rules of procedure.