Flood Control Bill of 1946: Hearings Before the Committee on Flood Control, House of Representatives, 79th Congress, 2d Session, on H. R. 6597, a Bill Authorizing the Construction of Certain Public Works on Rivers and Harbors for Flood Control, and for Other Purposes; Apr. 8-19, and May 2, 3, and 14, 1946 |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 7
Page 167
Yes . Mr . HICKMAN . Well , if you build the dam , it will be built between two high
mountains , and I believe in order to get to the lake you will either have to go up
over a high mountain and come down on the other side or you will ...
Yes . Mr . HICKMAN . Well , if you build the dam , it will be built between two high
mountains , and I believe in order to get to the lake you will either have to go up
over a high mountain and come down on the other side or you will ...
Page 168
That , sir , I believe is the general opinion of most people today , that the
Government is handing out something and if they do not get it , someone else will
. The CHAIRMAN . We are glad to have your statement and I would be glad if you
would ...
That , sir , I believe is the general opinion of most people today , that the
Government is handing out something and if they do not get it , someone else will
. The CHAIRMAN . We are glad to have your statement and I would be glad if you
would ...
Page 274
It is not over that , I do not believe . The CHAIRMAN . In protecting the city of
Vincennes , does it protect the road there ? Mr . McBRIDE . It does not . The
CHAIRMAN . In other words , your industrial spur is not protected by that levee ?
It is not over that , I do not believe . The CHAIRMAN . In protecting the city of
Vincennes , does it protect the road there ? Mr . McBRIDE . It does not . The
CHAIRMAN . In other words , your industrial spur is not protected by that levee ?
Page 336
... because the cost would exceed the benefits . It was then brought up at a later
time , I believe in 1938 , in the Flood Flood Control Act of 1938 , and was
approved at that time tentatively , but it is not under the Muskingum Conservancy
District .
... because the cost would exceed the benefits . It was then brought up at a later
time , I believe in 1938 , in the Flood Flood Control Act of 1938 , and was
approved at that time tentatively , but it is not under the Muskingum Conservancy
District .
Page 358
They are not asking that the Shoals Dam be authorized? The Chairman. No. I
think that is pretty clear. Mr. McCowen. Manchester, Ohio; New Richmond, Ohio;
Ripley, Ohio; Moscow, Ohio; Aberdeen, Ohio; and Chilo, Ohio. I believe that is all
of ...
They are not asking that the Shoals Dam be authorized? The Chairman. No. I
think that is pretty clear. Mr. McCowen. Manchester, Ohio; New Richmond, Ohio;
Ripley, Ohio; Moscow, Ohio; Aberdeen, Ohio; and Chilo, Ohio. I believe that is all
of ...
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Common terms and phrases
acres additional affected ALLEN amount annual appropriation approved Army engineers authorized average bank basin believe benefits Board building capacity caused CHAIRMAN channel Chief of Engineers Colonel HERB committee communities completed Congress conservation consideration construction cost County CRAWFORD Creek damage Department desire district district engineer drainage easements entire estimated existing fact farm favor Federal flood control flow follows Fredericksburg further give glad Government hearings House improvement increase industrial interests Jackson Lake land levee located lower matter mean miles Mississippi River necessary occurred Ohio operation percent plant present problem proposed questions railroad recommended record Representatives reservoir respect result River Salem Secretary statement stream submitted tion town tributaries understand United Valley Virginia Washington West WHEELER
Popular passages
Page 166 - Interior, who shall transmit and dispose of such power and energy in such manner as to encourage the most widespread use thereof at the lowest possible rates to consumers consistent with sound business principles, the rate schedules to become effective upon confirmation and approval by the Federal Power Commission.
Page 624 - The practice, pleadings, forms, and modes of proceeding in civil causes, other than equity and admiralty causes in the Circuit and District Courts, shall conform, as near as may be, to the practice, pleadings, and forms and modes of proceeding, existing at the time in like causes in the courts of record of the State, within which such Circuit or District Courts are held, any rule of the court to the contrary notwithstanding.
Page 698 - That penstocks or other similar facilities adapted to possible future use in the development of hydroelectric power shall be installed in any dam herein authorized when approved by the Secretary of War upon the recommendation of the Chief of Engineers and of the Federal Power Commission...
Page 443 - That the Board of Engineers for Rivers and Harbors, created under Section 3 of the River and Harbor Act approved June 13, 1902, be, and is hereby requested to review the...
Page 26 - California, is hereby authorized substantially in accordance with the plans contained in House Document Numbered 630, Seventy-sixth Congress, third session, with such modifications thereof as in the discretion of the Secretary of War and the Chief of Engineers may be advisable...
Page 175 - ... if the benefits to whomsoever they may accrue are in excess of the estimated costs, and if the lives and social security of people are otherwise adversely affected.
Page 175 - June 22, 1936, and to supplement the preliminary examinations and surveys which the Secretary of War has heretofore been authorized and directed to make of waterways with a view to the control of their floods, the Secretary of Agriculture be, and he is hereby, authorized and directed to cause preliminary examinations and surveys to be made for run-off and water-flow retardation and soilerosion prevention on the watersheds of said waterways, the costs thereof to be paid from appropriations heretofore...
Page 52 - Treasury not otherwise appropriated, to be immediately available, and to be expended under the direction of the Secretary of War and the supervision of the Chief of Engineers, for the construction, completion, repair, and preservation of the public works hereinafter named: ***** Sec.
Page 664 - States, political subdivisions thereof, or other responsible local agencies have given assurances satisfactory to the Secretary of War that they will (a) provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way necessary for the construction of the project...
Page 36 - That hereafter no money appropriated under authority of this Act shall be expended on the construction of any project until States, political subdivisions thereof, or other responsible local agencies have given assurances satisfactory to the Secretary of War...
Bibliographic information
| Title | Flood Control Bill of 1946: Hearings Before the Committee on Flood Control, House of Representatives, 79th Congress, 2d Session, on H. R. 6597, a Bill Authorizing the Construction of Certain Public Works on Rivers and Harbors for Flood Control, and for Other Purposes; Apr. 8-19, and May 2, 3 ... |
| Author | United States. Congress. House. Committee on Flood Control |
| Publisher | U.S. Government Printing Office, 1946 |
| Original from | the Library of Congress |
| Digitized | 4 Apr 2007 |
| Length | 700 pages |
| Export Citation | BiBTeX EndNote RefMan |