Page images
PDF
EPUB

ОР

CASES

ARGUED AND DETERMINED

IN THE

English Ecclesiastical Courts:

WITH

TABLES OF THE CASES AND PRINCIPAL MATTERS.

EDITED BY
EDWARD D. INGRAHAM, ESQUIRE,

OF THE PHILADELPHIA BAR.

VOL. IV.

CONTAINING

HAGGARD'S REPORTS; VOL. II.

AND

HAGGARD'S CONSISTORIAL REPORTS, VOLS. I. & II.

PHILADELPHIA:
P. H. NICKLIN AND T. JOHNSON, LAW BOOKSELLERS,

No. 175 CHESTNUT STREET.

1832.

[merged small][ocr errors]

tam frwick

[ocr errors]

baron y lides, bearbloc Bear and Beaurain Beckford Belisario Bennet v dugham srd v. Elagrave Blythe, Bonaker Bott, W Bowzer Breithw Briggs Brisco Brome Brown Burgoy Burn v Surgess Bart va

a. 56504

JUL 9 1901

Ditt v J Butler

Buzzard

[blocks in formation]

Mifflin & Party, Printers,

59 Locust Strect.

Crompt Crosley Dalby Dalrym

[ocr errors]

TABLE

NAMES OF THE CASES

REPORTED IN THIS VOLUME.

B.

Bardin v Calcott

Barham v Barham

Barwick v Mullins

Barton v Wells

Bawdes, Amhurst v
Bearblock v Meakins
Bear and Biles y Jacob
Beauraine v Beauraine
Beckford, Hubbard v
Belisario, Lindo v

Bennet v Bonaker

Bingham, Duke of Portland v

Bird v. Bird

Blagrave, re

Blythe, Savage v

Bonaker, Bennet y

Bott, Williams v

Bowzer y Ricketts

Breithwaite v Hollingshead

Briggs v Morgan

Brisco v Brisco

Bromer, Goldsmid v

Brown y Brown

Burgoyne v Free

Burn v Farrar

Burgess v Burgess

Burt v Cope

Butt y Jones

Butler v Crompton

Buzzard v Gilbert

C.

Calcott, Bardin v
Campbell, re
Cargill v Spence
Cart, Rees v
Chambers y Chambers
Cleaver, Kinleside v
Colvin v Fraser
Corri, Hawke v
Cope, Burt v
Courtail v. Homfray
Cowcher, Reay v
Cox v Goodday
Crisp and Ryder v Walpole
Crompton, Butler v
Crosley, re

D.

Dalby v Pritchard

Dalrymple v Dalrymple

237

« PreviousContinue »