Auto Safety Oversight Hearing--Corvair Heater: Hearing, Ninety-second Congress, First [i.e Second] Session ...
U.S. Government Printing Office, 1972 - Automobiles - 755 pages
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
accident action Administration answer automobile believe carbon monoxide cause Chevrolet claims complaints concerning condition copy correct Corvair Corvair owners cost court cylinder head damage dealer defect defendant Department deposition determination Detroit direct air Division document driving effect engine exhaust existence fact failure Federal files fumes head head gasket heater heating system Highway indicated injuries inspection interest involved issued leaks letter levels manufacturer material matter mean Michigan motor vehicle Motors Corporation NHTSA notification object operation owners passenger compartment Pennsylvania person Petry plaintiff possible present problem procedure protect purchased question reason recall received records referred repairs request respect responsibility result safety Senator Senator HARTKE specific standards statement tell tion understand valve WARD warranty witness WOLF
Page 53 - Nation may — 1. fulfill the responsibilities of each generation as trustee of the environment for succeeding generations 2. assure for all Americans safe, healthful, productive, and esthetically and culturally pleasing surroundings 3.
Page 509 - ... an undue burden upon interstate commerce in violation of the commerce clause of the Constitution...
Page 228 - You are hereby summoned and required to serve upon , plaintiff's attorney whose address is , and upon , who is attorney for CD, defendant and third-party plaintiff, and whose address is an answer to the third-party complaint which is herewith served upon you within 20 days after the service of this summons upon you exclusive of the day of service. If you fail to do so, judgment by default will be taken against you for the relief demanded in the third-party complaint.
Page 522 - When two or more plaintiffs, having separate and distinct demands, unite for convenience and economy in a single suit, it is essential that the demand of each be of the requisite jurisdictional amount; but when several plaintiffs unite to enforce a single title or right in which they have a common and undivided interest, it is enough if their interests collectively equal the jurisdictional amount.
Page 467 - If persons constituting a class are so numerous as to make it impracticable to bring them all before the court...
Page 467 - ... (1) joint, or common, or secondary in the sense that the owner of a primary right refuses to enforce that right and a member of the class thereby becomes entitled to enforce it...
Page 474 - ... controlling the prosecution or defense of separate actions; (B) the extent and nature of any litigation concerning the controversy already commenced by or against members of the class; (C) the desirability or undesirability of concentrating the litigation of the claims in the particular forum; (D) the difficulties likely to be encountered in the management of a class action.
Page 503 - Whether due process is satisfied must depend rather upon the quality and nature of the activity in relation to the fair and orderly administration of the laws which it was the purpose of the due process clause to insure. That clause does not contemplate that a state may make binding a judgment in personam against an individual or corporate defendant with which the state has no contacts, ties, or relations.