Page images
PDF
EPUB
[merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][ocr errors][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small]

THE FEDERAL-STATE COOPERATIVE PROGRAM

NON-FEDERAL REIMBURSABLE PROGRAM

Non-Federal reimbursable funds are unmatched funds received by the Geological Survey from State and local agencies in situations where Federal and State agencies are interested in investigation of water resources but where matching Federal funds are either unavailable or are not otherwise applicable to cost sharing.

Budget and Personnel

The Cooperative Program is based on the concept that Federal, State, and local governments have a mutual interest in evaluating, planning, developing, and managing the Nation's water resources. The immense size of the task of appraising the Nation's water resources precludes accomplishment by Federal efforts only. Similarly, State and local agencies working independently cannot relate to the sizable regional aspects of hydrologic systems. Because many water problems begin at the local level, the Geological Survey has cooperative agreements with all States under which each party funds one-half of the cost of financing studies of water resources. Cooperation through this program provides an economical and comprehensive system for waterresources assessments.

Most projects under the Cooperative Program respond to a recognized problem or define a potential one. In addition to data collection, programs may focus on water use and availability, the impact of man's activities on the hydrologic environment, and energyrelated water demands that may strain available water supplies. In emergency situations, such as drought or flood, events are extensively monitored, and the data accumulated under the Cooperative Program prove invaluable.

101.

At the end of fiscal year 1984, the Water Resources Division employed 3,367 full-time personnel. This number included scientists and engineers, who represented all fields of hydrology and related sciences, technical specialists, and administrative, secretarial, and clerical employees. An additional 634 permanent part-time and intermittent employees assisted in the work of the Division.

The $218.5 million obligated in 1984 for water resources investigation activities came from the following sources: 1. Direct Congressional appropriations. 2. Congressional, State, and local

appropriations for 50–50 funding in the Federal-State Cooperative

Program. 3. Funds transferred from other

Federal agencies. 4. Funds transferred from State and

local agencies.

ASSISTANCE TO OTHER FEDERAL AGENCIES

Highlights

With funds transferred from other Federal agencies, the Geological Survey performs a wide variety of work related to the specific needs of each agency.

In the following sections, highlights from some of the major programs are described.

New Merit Proposal Process Sparks the Federal-State Cooperative Program

The Federal-State Cooperative Program continues to be the largest component of the U.S. Geological Survey's water-resources activity. This Program was carried out in working partnership with more than 800 State, regional, and local agencies during fiscal year 1984. Joint funding in the 50–50 matching Cooperative Program totaled about $100 million and comprised almost one-half of the overall program of the Water Resources Division. Hydrologic data collection and interpretive investigations were being conducted in every State, Puerto Rico, and several United States territories.

Each year, cooperator proposals typically exceed Federal funds that are available for matching by several million dollars. Priorities for data collection and hydrologic investigations are based on a continuing, detailed analysis of water problems and issues. This analysis is carried out through discussions with State and local cooperators, Federal agency officials, and the general public. For 1984, the principal concerns identified in these discussions were ground-water contamination, water supply and demand, stream quality, hydrologic hazards, and acid precipitation. Most of the Federal matching funds are allocated to highest priority activities by the Division's four Regional Offices after ranking the work proposed in their respective geographical areas of responsibility.

The Geological Survey now has a new process for funding selected proposals for water-resources investigations as part of the Federal-State Cooperative Program. In brief, part of the Cooperative Program appropriation is identified to undertake investigations chosen from a number of proposals on the basis of a merit ranking system. The process provides for a national level evaluation of each proposal based on the potential for transferring knowledge to be gained to other locations, the originality and quality of the scientific approach, and the anticipated contribution of the investigation to the advancement of science and technology. The Federal

support for merit proposals was $1 million in fiscal year 1983 and a like amount in fiscal year 1984; with matching cooperative funds, the total was about $2 million each year. In 1983, 16 investigations were selected of the 33 proposed, and, in 1984, 15 of 44 proposals were selected. Plans are to identify $1 million of U.S. Geological Survey matching funds for investigations to be chosen through this process in fiscal year 1985.

The new process formalizes existing procedures that have been used for the past 10 to 15 years to rank candidate proposals for the allocation of funds. Additional effort is applied, however, to ensure that the highest priority work is undertaken and that the anticipated technical contributions to the science of hydrology will be of top quality. Each merit proposal is reviewed and evaluated separately by five members of the Geological Survey's senior staff. The group then consolidates rankings, arbitrates differences, and allocates funds to the investigations in priority order.

Examples of current investigations selected through the merit proposal process are as follows:

Hazardous waste, Washington

State.-In the State of Washington,
more than 200 hazardous waste
sites are located where a high
probability of leachate impacts
surface and ground water. The
State is developing a major pro-
gram to deal with this problem and
has asked the Geological Survey for
technical assistance. The resulting
investigation consists of the
following phases: (1) hydrogeologic
characterization of existing hazard-
ous waste sites, (2) research on
how the pollutants are moving
through the hydrologic system and
on the reaction processes that are
involved, (3) broad characterization
of the most and least suitable areas
within the State for land disposal of
hazardous waste, and (4) technical
assistance in the evaluation of the
hydrogeological aspects of pro-

[graphic][merged small][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][merged small][merged small]

• Ground water in fractured-limestone

formations near Brunswick,
Georgia. - The dependence upon
fractured-rock aquifers to supply
much of the Nation's ground water
makes it imperative that methods
continue to be developed to simu-
late accurately ground-water move-
ment in these aquifers. The
primary objectives of this investiga-
tion are to evaluate the strengths
and weaknesses of existing
mathematical models for simulating
hydrogeologic flow in a fractured-
limestone aquifer and to develop, if
necessary, a mathematical model
capable of simulating flow in a
fractured-rock aquifer. Results
from this study will contribute to
the understanding of the fractured
and locally faulted limestone
aquifer in the Brunswick area and
will have transfer value to

Wastes associated with mining, North

Dakota.—Low grade uranium ore in western North Dakota's lignite was concentrated by open-pit burning of the lignite during the 1950's and 1960's. Investigations since October 1983 reveal that base flows in streams as far as 4 miles downgradient from the open pit have a uranium content in excess of 200 micrograms per liter, about 10 times the regional background. (Nuclear Regulatory Commission regulations allow a maximum permissible concentration of 30,000 picocuries of natural uranium per liter for release into water.)

Precipitation quality, Massachu

setts.-An investigation of the relationships between air-mass movement and variations in the quality of precipitation has been

underway in Massachusetts since September 1983. Values of pH in precipitation samples range from 3.7 to 5.4; most are from 4.2 to 4.8. The value 5.6 is considered to be the dividing line between acid and nonacid precipitation. Precipitation with a pH of less than 5.6 is called "acid rain.” Meterological data are being obtained from the National Weather Service and private sources to identify such characteristics as air-mass source, trajectory, storm type, and season. These investigations are designed to clarify some of the questions regarding acid precipitation in the Northeastern United States, and

[blocks in formation]

WATER RESOURCES SCIENTIFIC INFORMATION CENTER

Authorized by the Water Resources Research Act of 1964, the Water Resources Scientific Information Center was established in 1967 as a national center to increase the availability and awareness of water-related scientific and technical information. In accomplishing this goal, the Center abstracts water-resource publications and makes the information available to the waterresources community and the public through publications and computerized bibliographic information services. The Center formerly was located in the Office of Water Research and Technology, but, in late 1982, the Secretary of the Interior transferred it to the U.S. Geological Survey's Water Resources Division where it would complement the Division's long-standing program of

disseminating water information to the public. The Center produces Selected Water Resources Abstracts, a monthly abstracting and indexing journal now in its 17th volume, which covered about 6,000 abstracts in 1984, with projections of 8,000 in 1985. The computerized abstracts file contains about 170,000 abstracts that have appeared in Selected Water Resources Abstracts since 1968. This file can be searched by Federal agencies and their contractors by means of the U.S. Department of Energy's RECON system and is commercially searchable worldwide via DIALOG Information Services, Inc. Topical bibliographies are produced along with the abstracts file such as the Abstracting and Indexing Guide and the Water Resources Thesaurus.

0.3.

[ocr errors][merged small]
« PreviousContinue »