Public Works Appropriations for 1968: Hearings ... 90th Congress, 1st Session, Part 1U.S. Government Printing Office, 1967 - Public works |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 97
Page 120
... Supervision and Administration based on a reanalysis of requirements including costs to date . Summary construction program ( PB − 1 ) , fiscal years 1967 and 1968 Item Project cost esti- mate Total to June 30 , 1966 Current fiscal ...
... Supervision and Administration based on a reanalysis of requirements including costs to date . Summary construction program ( PB − 1 ) , fiscal years 1967 and 1968 Item Project cost esti- mate Total to June 30 , 1966 Current fiscal ...
Page 131
... Supervision and Administration based on reanalysis of requirements . Summary construction program ( PB − 1 ) , fiscal years 1967 and 1968 Item Project cost esti- mate Balance to complete after fiscal Total to June 30 , 1966 Current ...
... Supervision and Administration based on reanalysis of requirements . Summary construction program ( PB − 1 ) , fiscal years 1967 and 1968 Item Project cost esti- mate Balance to complete after fiscal Total to June 30 , 1966 Current ...
Page 141
... Supervision and Administration based on the increase in project cost and a reanalysis of requirements . These increases were partially offset by a reduction of $ 698,000 due to favorable bids and $ 165,000 due to under - runs on ...
... Supervision and Administration based on the increase in project cost and a reanalysis of requirements . These increases were partially offset by a reduction of $ 698,000 due to favorable bids and $ 165,000 due to under - runs on ...
Page 144
... SUPERVISION AND ADMINISTRATION COSTS Mr. BOLAND . $ 5,900,000 is budgeted to continue construction of the Saylorville Reservoir in Iowa . Without any cost changes except for price level increases , why is it necessary to increase ...
... SUPERVISION AND ADMINISTRATION COSTS Mr. BOLAND . $ 5,900,000 is budgeted to continue construction of the Saylorville Reservoir in Iowa . Without any cost changes except for price level increases , why is it necessary to increase ...
Page 146
... Supervision and Administration because of design changes found necessary . These increases were partially offset by a decrease of $ 59,000 for items of work determined to be the responsibility of local interests . Summary construction ...
... Supervision and Administration because of design changes found necessary . These increases were partially offset by a decrease of $ 59,000 for items of work determined to be the responsibility of local interests . Summary construction ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
acre-feet Allocation for fiscal Allocations to June Appropriations required Balance to complete Benefit-cost benefit-cost ratio bridges carryover from prior channel Comparison of Federal complete after fiscal construction program PB-1 Corps of Engineers cost estimates.-The current cost Federal funds Creek current Federal cost Delaware River drainage Drainage basin Engineering and design Estimated Federal cost Estimated non-Federal cost estimated project cost estimates.-The current Federal Federal cost estimate Federal cost estimates.-The feet fiscal year 1968 Flood Control Act improvement increase June 30 KIRWAN Lake Lands and damages latest estimate levee lock and dam maintenance miles Mississippi River navigation Ohio River Pending adjustments preconstruction planning Project cost esti Relocations Reservoir River Basin spillway square miles Summarized financial data Summary construction program Supervision and administration Total applied cost Total estimated project Total funds available Total obligations Total project cost Trinity River Undelivered orders Undistributed cost Unobligated carryover Wabash River water supply WHITTEN
Popular passages
Page 420 - Preference in the .sale of such power and energy shall be given to public bodies and cooperatives.
Page 805 - That penstocks or other similar facilities adapted to possible future use in the development of hydroelectric power shall be installed in any dam herein authorized when approved by the Secretary of War upon the recommendation of the Chief of Engineers and of the Federal Power Commission.
Page 227 - State shall be paid by the Secretary of the Treasury to such State; and 50 per centum of the charges arising from all other licenses hereunder is hereby reserved and appropriated as a special fund in the Treasury to be expended under the direction of the Secretary of War in the maintenance and operation of dams and other navigation structures owned by the United States or in the construction, maintenance, or operation of headwater or other improvements of navigable waters of the United States.
Page 640 - System or a public land area, which, although it is part of a larger area, is commonly used by the public as a means of travel between two places, either or both of which are outside the area...
Page 239 - ... adopt and promote uniform and coordinated policies for water conservation, control and development in the basin; and to encourage the planning, development and financing of water resources projects according to such plans and policies.
Page 676 - Army that they will : (1) provide, without cost to the United States, all lands, easements, and rights-of-way necessary for the construction of the project...
Page 767 - USCS § 702d]; (c) provide without cost to the United States, all rights-of-way for levee foundations and levees on the main stem of the Mississippi River between Cape Girardeau, Missouri, and the Head of Passes.
Page 236 - ARTICLE 3 Powers and Duties of the Commission Section 3.1. PURPOSE AND POLICY. The commission shall develop and effectuate plans, policies and projects relating to the water resources of the basin.
Page 902 - Costs of regulation of streamflow features incorporated in any Federal reservoir or other impoundment under the provisions of this Act shall be determined and the beneficiaries identified and if the benefits are widespread or national in scope, the costs of such features shall be nonreimbursable.
Page 409 - The value of power to the users is measured by the amount that they should be willing to pay for such power. The usual practice is to measure the benefit in terms of the cost of achieving the same result by the most likely alternative means that would exist in the absence of the project.