Annual Report of the Chief of Engineers, U.S. Army, on Civil Works Activities, Volume 2U.S. Government Printing Office, 1955 - Civil engineering |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 100
Page 82
... Maintenance $ 14,414 , 832 1,030,806 935 , 303 $ 1,949 , 992 16 , 380 , 941 1,949 , 992 Total $ 16 , 364 , 824 1,030,806 935 , 303 18 , 330 , 933 In addition $ 17,767 has been expended from contributed funds , all for maintenance . Cost ...
... Maintenance $ 14,414 , 832 1,030,806 935 , 303 $ 1,949 , 992 16 , 380 , 941 1,949 , 992 Total $ 16 , 364 , 824 1,030,806 935 , 303 18 , 330 , 933 In addition $ 17,767 has been expended from contributed funds , all for maintenance . Cost ...
Page 82
... Maintenance : Appropriated Cost . 1951 1952 1953 1954 1955 Total to June 30 , 1955 , includ- ing fiscal years prior to 1951 $ 1,083 , 50-4 1,083 , 504 $ 2,100 1,483 $ 617 $ 108,000 106,773 842 , 505 841 , 278 8. CUTTYHUNK HARBOR , MASS ...
... Maintenance : Appropriated Cost . 1951 1952 1953 1954 1955 Total to June 30 , 1955 , includ- ing fiscal years prior to 1951 $ 1,083 , 50-4 1,083 , 504 $ 2,100 1,483 $ 617 $ 108,000 106,773 842 , 505 841 , 278 8. CUTTYHUNK HARBOR , MASS ...
Page 82
... maintenance . The total costs for all funds were $ 38,810 for new work and $ 429,253 for maintenance , a total of $ 468,063 . Cost and financial summary Fiscal year ending June 30 1951 1952 1953 1954 1955 Total to June 30 , 1955 ...
... maintenance . The total costs for all funds were $ 38,810 for new work and $ 429,253 for maintenance , a total of $ 468,063 . Cost and financial summary Fiscal year ending June 30 1951 1952 1953 1954 1955 Total to June 30 , 1955 ...
Page 82
... maintenance dredging in the section of the channel and harbor above Sabin Point Light were accomplished at a cost of $ 4,068 , all mainte- nance funds . Total maintenance costs were $ 108,468 . Condition at end of fiscal year . The ...
... maintenance dredging in the section of the channel and harbor above Sabin Point Light were accomplished at a cost of $ 4,068 , all mainte- nance funds . Total maintenance costs were $ 108,468 . Condition at end of fiscal year . The ...
Page 82
... maintenance is $ 5,000 . The existing project was authorized by the following River and Harbor Acts : Acts Work authorized June 3 , 1896 1 Mar. 3. 1905 Present channel dimensions . Mar. 2 , 1945 Removal of obstructions near Watch Hill ...
... maintenance is $ 5,000 . The existing project was authorized by the following River and Harbor Acts : Acts Work authorized June 3 , 1896 1 Mar. 3. 1905 Present channel dimensions . Mar. 2 , 1945 Removal of obstructions near Watch Hill ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
100 feet wide 1st sess 2d sess 30 feet acre-feet additional amount needed Annual Report Arkansas River available for succeeding Bayou bridge Canal channel Chief of Engineers Condition at end Cong construction contract contributed funds Control Act approved cooperation Cost and financial Creek cubic yards district dredging end of fiscal ending June 30 Estimated additional amount existing project feet deep feet long financial summary Fiscal fiscal year ending fiscal years prior Flood Control Act Gulf Intracoastal Waterway Harbor Act hired labor includ jetty July June 28 Lake Okeechobee latest published map levee Location locks and dams mean low water Mermentau River miles Mississippi River Missouri River mouth navigation Ohio River Operations and results percent complete Port previous projects project dimensions project was authorized provides Reservoir results during fiscal River and Harbor River Basin spillway succeeding fiscal Terminal facilities total cost Total to June turning basin United width
Popular passages
Page 436 - Army that they will : (a) provide without cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way necessary for the construction of the project; (6) hold and save the United States free from damages...
Page 426 - California, is hereby authorized substantially in accordance with the plans contained in House Document Numbered 630, Seventy-sixth Congress, third session, with such modifications thereof as in the discretion of the Secretary of War and the Chief of Engineers may be advisable...
Page 760 - The general comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes in the Missouri River Basin approved by the Act of June 28, 1938...
Page 413 - Local cooperation. — This provides that local interests agree to furnish, free of cost to the United States, all lands, easements, rights-of-way, and spoil-disposal areas...
Page 515 - ... navigable streams and tributaries thereof when in the opinion of the Chief of Engineers such work is advisable in the interest of flood control: Provided, That not more than $25,000 shall be allotted for this purpose for any single tributary from the appropriations for any one fiscal year.
Page 241 - Modification of the project was approved subject to the provisions that local interests furnish free of cost to the United States all lands, easements, and rights-of-way and spoil-disposal areas for the initial work and for subsequent maintenance when and as required...
Page 643 - States of $2,252,000 for construction; provided that local interests give assurances satisfactory to the Secretary of the Army that they will : (a...
Page 420 - States, all necessary lands, easements, rights-of-way, and suitable spoil-disposal areas for new work and subsequent maintenance when and as required, and hold and save the United States free from claims for damages that may result from the improvement.
Page 25 - Flood Control and Flood Plain Management Federal interest in flood control began in the alluvial valley of the Mississippi River in the 19th century when the interrelationship of flood control and navigation became apparent.
Page 568 - June 28, 1938, approved the general comprehensive plan for flood control and other purposes in the upper Mississippi River Basin described in the Flood Control Committee Document No. 1, Seventy-fifth Congress, first session, with such modifications thereof as in the discretion of the Secretary of War and the Chief of Engineers may be advisable...