Why History?: Ethics and Postmodernity
"Why History?" is a compelling introduction to the issue of history and ethics. Designed to provoke discussion, the book asks whether and why a good knowledge and understanding of the past is desirable. In the context of current postmodern thinking, Keith Jenkins suggests that the goal of "learning lessons from the past" actually means learning lessons from stories written by historians and others. If the past as history has no foundation, can anything ethical be gained from history? Daring and controversial, "Why History?" presents liberating challenges to history and ethics, proposing that we have reached an emancipatory moment which is well beyond the "end of history."
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
On the end of metanarratives
On Jean Baudrillard
On JeanFrançois Lyotard
On Hayden White
On Frank Ankersmit
Beyond histories and ethics
On David Harlan
Other editions - View all
accept Accordingly actually allows Ankersmit answer appropriations argues argument attempt basis Baudrillard become choice claim coming concept condition Consequently constitute construct context contingent course critique culture decision deconstruction defence definitive Derrida discourse effect Ermarth ethics Evans Evans's example existence fact fiction follows foundations future genre give given Harlan historians Ibid idea imaginaries imagined impossible interests interpretation ironic kind language least live logic longer look lower Lyotard meaning metaphysical modernist modes moral narrative natural never notion object once past philosophy political position possible postmodern postmodernists practices precisely present problems produced proper question radical reality reason refer relativism relativistic remarks rhetoric Rorty rules seems sense social sort statements theory things thought truth University upper White writing