Page images
PDF
EPUB

TABLE OF CONTENTS.

Page.

I-XLVIII

Letter of Commissioner transmitting his Annual Report, 1; Report of Com-

missioner, 5; Surveying Operations, 6; Survey of Dakota and Wyoming

Boundary, 21; Resurvey of Boundary between Arkansas and Indian Terri-

tory, 22; Disposal of Public Lands, 27; Pre-emption, 28; Homesteads, 43;

Timber Culture, 45; Mineral Lands, 86; Coal Patents, 96; Timber Lands

and Timber Depredations, 117; Private Land Claims, 124; Southern Public

Lands, 132; Timber and Stone Lands, 133; Islands and Beds of Meandered

Lakes, Sloughs, and Ponds, 138; Abandoned Military Reservations, 140;

Indian Lands'in Kansas, 141; Military Reservations, 144; Needed Facilities

for Exemplification of Official Records, 144; Area of Public Domain Sur-

veyed during fiscal year, and remaining Unsurveyed, 146; Lands Sold and

Entered under Homestead and Timber Culture, 147; Swamp Lands, 166;

Lands Approved to the several States, 166; Lands Patented to the several

States, 167; Issues and Locations with Bounty-Land Warrants, 168; Land

Concessions to States and Corporations for Railroads and Military Wagon-

Road Purposes, 169; Rights of Way to Railway Companies, 176; Land

Concessions for Canal Purposes, 178; Attachment of Railroad Rights, 179;

List of Lapsed Railroad Grants, 184; Abstract of Suspended Cases in the

Public Lands Division Confirmed by the Board of Adjudicators, 186; Ab-

stract of Suspended Cases Rejected by the Board of Equitable Adjudica-

tion, 200; Commissioner's Letter transmitting Estimates of Appropria-

tions required by the General Land Office during the fiscal year ending

June 30, 1830, 202; Historical and Statistical Table of Lands of the United

States and Territories, 221; List of United States Land Offices, 224; Re-

port of the Surveyor-General of Louisiana, 227; Report of the Surveyor-

General of Florida, 233; Report of the Surveyor-General of Minnesota, 236;

Report of the Surveyor-General of Dakota, 243; Report of the Surveyor-

General of Nebraska, 257; Report of the Surveyor-General of Wyoming,

265; Report of the Surveyor-General of New Mexico, 273; Report of the

Surveyor-General of Colorado, 287; Report of the Surveyor-General of

Montana, 295; Report of the Surveyor-General of Idaho, 313; Report of the

Surveyor-General of Utah, 319; Report of the Surveyor-General of Ne-

vada, 334; Report of the Surveyor-General of Arizona, 344; Report of the

Surveyor-General of Washington Territory, 352; Report of the Surveyor-

General of Oregon, 363; Report of the Surveyor-General of California, 377.

Report of Commissioner of Indian Affairs................

Changes and Improvements in Bureau, 439; Consolidation of Agencies, 440;

Permanent Land Title for Indians, 442; Indian Auxiliaries, 445; Outbreak

of the Bannocks, 446; Northern Cheyenne Raid, 455; Missouri River

Squatters and Firewood, 457; Education and Civilization, 457;` Indian

Statutes, 459; Marriage Relations, 459; Ogalala and Brulé Sioux, 460;

Chief Joseph and his Nez Percés, 464; Modocs, 465; Poncas, 466; Uma-

tilla Reservation, 467; Indian Territory, 468; Pimas, Maricopas, and

Papagoes, 469; Removals from Cimarron and Abiquiu, 470; Ute Commis

sion, 471; Indian Police, 471; Telegraphic Communication with Agencies,

472; Necessity for a Warehouse in the West, 472; Indian Youth at Hamp-

ton, 473; Changes among Agencies, 473; Board of Indian Commissioners,

474; Commission to Appraise Cherokee Lands in Indian Territory, 477;

Commission to Appraise Kansas Indian Lands, 477; Methods of Conduct-

ing Business in Indian Office, 479; Report of Purchasing Committee, 492;

Remarks on Changes in Methods, 493; Reports of Indian Agents, 495:-

Colorado River Agency, Arizona, 497; Pima Agency, Arizona, 498; San

Carlos Agency, Arizona, 502; Moquis Pueblo Agency, Arizona, 504; Hoopa

Valley Agency, California, 506; Round Valley Agency, California, 506;

Tule River Agency, California, 509; Los Pinos Agency, Colorado, 510;

Southern Ute Agency, Colorado, 512; White River Agency, Colorado,

514; Cheyenne River Agency, Dakota, 516; Crow Creek Agency, Dakota,

520; Devil's Lake Agency, Dakota, 522; Flandreau Special Agency, Da-

kota, 526; Fort Berthold Agency, Dakota, 528; Lower Brulé Agency,

Dakota, 530; Pine Ridge (formerly Red Cloud) Agency, Dakota, 532;

Rosebud (formerly Spotted Tail) Agency, Dakota, 534; Sisseton Agency,

Dakota, 536; Standing Rock Agency, Dakota, 539; Yankton Agency, Da-

kota, 542; Fort Hall Agency, Idaho, 545; Lemhi Agency, Idaho, 547;

Nez Percé Agency, Idaho, 548; Cheyenne and Arapaho Agency, Indian

Territory, 550; Kiowa and Comanche Agency, Indian Territory, 554;

Pawnee Agency, Indian Territory, 558; Ponca Agency, Indian Territory,

560; Quapaw Agency, Indian Territory, 561; Sac and Fox Agency, In-

dian Territory, 564; Wichita Agency, Indian Territory, 556; Sac and Fox

Agency, Iowa, 566; Kansas Agency, 568; Mackinaw Agency, Michigan,

570; Leech Lake Agency, Minnesota, 572; Red Lake Agency, Minnesota,

574; Chippewa Agency (White Earth), Minnesota, 575; Blackfeet Agency,

Montana, 578; Crow Agency, Montana, 580; Flathead Agency, Montana,

583; Fort Peck Agency, Montana, 585; Great Nemaha Agency, Nebraska,

589; Omaha Agency, Nebraska, 591; Otoe Agency, Nebraska, 591; Santee

Agency, Nebraska, 595; Winnebago Agency, Nebraska, 596; Nevada

Agency, Nevada, 598; Western Shoshone Agency, Nevada, 600; Abiquiu

Agency, New Mexico, 602; Mescalero Apache Agency, New Mexico, 603;

Navajo Agency, New Mexico, 603; Pueblo Agency, New Mexico, 605; New

York Agency, New York, 606; Grande Ronde Agency, Oregon, 608; Kla-

math Agency, Oregon, 609; Malheur Agency, Oregon, 611; Siletz Agency,

Oregon, 616; Umatilla Agency, Oregon, 618; Warm Springs Agency, Ore-

gon, 620; Uintah Valley Agency, Utah, 622; Fort Colville Agency, Wash-

ington Territory, 625; Neah Bay Agency, Washington Territory, 626;

Puyallup, Nisqually, &c., Agency, Washington Territory, 628; S'Koko-

mish Agency, Washington Territory, 633; Tulalip Agency, Washington

Territory, 634; Yakama Agency, Washington Territory, 635; Green Bay

Agency, Wisconsin, 638; La Pointe Agency, Wisconsin, 640; Shoshone

and Bannock Agency, Wyoming Territory, 644; Report of Sioux Commis-

sion, 652; Report of Commission to Appraise Cherokee Lands in Indian

Territory, 65; Additional Report of same, 659; Tabular Description of

Cherokee Lands in Indian Territory, 662; Report of Special Agent to Col-

REPORT

OF

THE SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR.

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR,

Washington, November 1, 1878.

SIR: I have the honor to submit the following summary of the operations of this department during the past year, together with such suggestions as seem to me worthy of consideration:

INDIAN AFFAIRS.

The report of the Commissioner of Indian Affairs is herewith submitted.

In my last annual report I sketched a plan of an "Indian policy," the principal points of which were the following:

1. The permanent location of the Indians on a smaller number of reservations containing a fair proportion of arable and pasture lands. 2. Encouragement of agricultural and pastoral pursuits by the furnishing of agricultural implements and domestic animals, and proper instructions by practical farmers.

3. The gradual allotment of small tracts of land to the heads of families, to be held in severalty under proper restrictions.

4. The discouragement of hunting, proper restrictions as to the possession of arms and ammunition by Indians, and a gradual exchange of ponies for cattle.

5. The extension of the laws of the United States over Indian reservations, to be enforced by proper tribunals, and the organization of an Indian police.

6. The labor of white men on Indian reservations as much as possible to be dispensed with, and proper discrimination to be made in the distribution of supplies and annuity goods and the granting of favors between Indians who work and those who live as idle vagabonds.

7. The establishment of schools for the instruction of Indian children in the English language, the elementary branches of knowledge, and especially in practical work.

8. Sufficient provision for the wants of the Indians until they become self-supporting.

This plan, put forth without any pretension to novelty, seemed to meet with general approval, as far as public opinion expressed itself,

« PreviousContinue »