Cases Argued and Decided in the Supreme Court of the United States (varies Slightly), Volume 74Lawyers Co-operative Publishing Company, 1930 - Law reports, digests, etc Complete with headnotes, summaries of decisions, statements of cases, points and authorities of counsel, annotations, tables, and parallel references. |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 42
Page 471
... receiver appointed in a foreclosure suit may properly be author- ized to bring . Argued April 11 and 12 , 1929. Decided V. David C. Beggs Co. ( C. C. ) 179 673 ; 1 Bates , New Pl . & Pr. Receivers , ยง 89 foreclosure suit - in ...
... receiver appointed in a foreclosure suit may properly be author- ized to bring . Argued April 11 and 12 , 1929. Decided V. David C. Beggs Co. ( C. C. ) 179 673 ; 1 Bates , New Pl . & Pr. Receivers , ยง 89 foreclosure suit - in ...
Page 475
... receiver , to bring the action in the district court . The common pleas court had previously appointed him receiver of all the property of the furnace company , both real and personal , and had di- rected and empowered him to take ...
... receiver , to bring the action in the district court . The common pleas court had previously appointed him receiver of all the property of the furnace company , both real and personal , and had di- rected and empowered him to take ...
Page 477
... receiver has no authority to Ohio , either for the purpose of bring- sue in the courts of a foreign juris- ing the suit or taking possession of diction to recover demands or prop- the property recovered ; and the erty therein situated ...
... receiver has no authority to Ohio , either for the purpose of bring- sue in the courts of a foreign juris- ing the suit or taking possession of diction to recover demands or prop- the property recovered ; and the erty therein situated ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
action affirmed Amendment annotation argued the cause assessment authority Bank carrier cent chap charge Chicago Circuit Court claim Commis Constitution contract Corp corporation County Court of Appeals decree Denied depreciation dismissed district court Electric ex rel February 24 Federal court Federal Trade Commission filed a brief franchise granted Headnote held income Internal Revenue Interstate Commerce Interstate Commerce Commission judgment jurisdiction Klesner liability Marvin Smith ment Messrs Missouri municipal N. Y. Supp October 14 October 21 Ohio Ohio ex rel P. R. Co pany peti Petition for Writ petitioner plaintiff police power provision public utility regulate respondent sion Solicitor General Hughes Stat statute street railway suit supra Supreme Court Teleg Teleph Texas tion U. S. C. title United States Circuit United States mem Washington Water Writ of Certiorari York city