| United States. Supreme Court - Courts - 1980 - 790 pages
...class certification pursuant to Fed. Rule Civ. Proc. 23 (b) .* The District Court denied the motion refusing to dissolve or modify injunctions, except...where a direct review may be had in the Supreme Court . . . ." 2 Compare Williams v. Wallace Silversmiths, Inc., 566 F. 2d 364 (CA2 1977); Williams v. Mumford,... | |
| United States - Law - 1971 - 1384 pages
...District of the Canal Zone, the District Court of Guam, and the District Court of the Virgin Islands, or of the judges thereof, granting, continuing, modifying,...where a direct review may be had in the Supreme Court; (2) Interlocutory orders appointing receivers, or refusing orders to wind up receiverships or to take... | |
| United States - Law - 1982 - 1226 pages
...have exclusive jurisdiction of appeals from interlocutory orders of the Court of International Trade > C .aD d t \"٠hS BZ $Q ## ?\#8^ u -Q R 2..._ h! YQt] * * K L em Ňxq 8a NFgW U 5 lV&\ מ{ ۥ (As amended July 26, 1979. Pub. L. 96-39. title X, § I001(b)(4)(A), 93 Stat. 305; Oct. 10, 1980. Pub.... | |
| United States - Law - 1971 - 1104 pages
...District of the Canal Zone, the District Court of Guam, and the District Court of the Virgin Islands, except where a direct review may be had in the Supreme Court. (June 25, 1948, ch. 646. 62 Stat. 929; Oct. 31. 1951, ch. 655, § 48, 65 Stat. 726; July 7, 1958, Pub.... | |
| United States - Interstate commerce - 1951 - 632 pages
...the Virgin Islands, or of the judges thereof, granting, continuing, modifying, refusing ondissolving injunctions, or refusing to dissolve or modify injunctions,...where a direct review may be had in the Supreme Court; (2) Interlocutory orders appointing receivers, or refusing orders to wind up receiverships or to take... | |
| United States. Supreme Court - Law reports, digests, etc - 1955 - 866 pages
...makes an exception to the requirement of finality, permitting appeals from "interlocutory orders . . . granting, continuing, modifying, refusing or dissolving...a direct review may be had in the Supreme Court." Appealability here turns on whether the District Court's refusal to stay this trial for arbitration... | |
| |