falsity. Moffitt v. Chicago Chronicle Co., 407; Locke v. Com- pany, 390.
LIENS-See CRED. BILLS, 1,2.
Agency No lien can be established against the property of a married woman, on the theory of her husband's agency, for lightning rods erected upon her house and barn, where she objected to their purchase and stated to her husband, in the presence of the agent, that if he entered into the contract he must pay for the rods with his own money, and at ail reason- able times protested against their erection.-James v. Dalbey, 463.
LIMITATION OF ACTIONS-See PLEAD., "; RAIL., 30. 1. Written Contract-A written agreement upon the back of an assessment certificate issued for a special assessment to pay for street paving, which is a plain assumption by the owner of the property of an obligation to pay and a waiver of all legal objections to the claim, in consideration of additional time, is a written contract upon which action is not barred until ten years from the time it accrued.-Talcott v. Noel, 470. 2. SAME-The right to attack a conveyance to a non-resident is not barred if exercised within five years after the property is con veyed to a resident.-Applegate v. Applegate, 312.
LIQUIDATED DAMAGES-See CONTRACTS, 7.
MALICIOUS PROSECUTION.
1. Justice-Where a justice issued a subpoena for a witness, with- out authority, and, on the witness not appearing, arrested and fined him for contempt, evidence of such facts is sufficient to take a case of false imprisonment against the justice to the jury.-Chambers v. Oehler, 155.
2. Constables-Where constables served warrants, apparently regular, arresting a witness for disob ying an invalid subpœa issued by the justice, they are not liable for false imprison- ment.- Idem.
MASTER AND SERVANT-See EVID., ; INTOX. LIQ., ; PARENT AND CHILD; RAIL., 11, 12, 23, 24, 31, 32
1. Risk of Employment-A boy fifteen years of age who, with- out objection or promise of repair, works for three years with a machine with revolving iron rollers placed within three- quarters of an inch of each other, assumes the risk incident to its use and waives any defects therein.-McCarthy v. Mul- grew, 76.
Small figures refer to subdivisions of Index. The others to page of report.
MAST. AND SERV. Continued
2. SAME-The danger of using a machine with unguarded revolv- ing rollers three-fourths of an inch apart is so obvious that the master need not warn a servant of it.-Idem.
3. SAME-Plaintiff, whose hand was injured by being caught between the rollers of an ironing mangle while she was putting beeswax on one of the rollers in obedience to her employers' orders, was twenty-one years old, and had often used the man- gle. She knew the danger of having her hand caught, and knew that the guard had been removed from in front of the rollers in order to allow her to do the work. Held, that her employers were not liable, although they did not warn her of the danger.-Hanson v. Hammel, 171.
1. Affidavit-An affidavit purporting to be that of one partner in claimant's firm, signed in the firm name and sworn to before the other partner, as an notary, is not a proper verification of a statement for a mechanic's lien. -McGillivary v. Case, 17. 2. CORRECTION-Code, section 357, providing that no defective affidavit shall prejudice the party making it if it be rectified within a reasonable time, so as not to cause essential injury, will not permit amendment of a defective affidavit for a mechanic's lien as against a subsequent bona fide mortgagee.- Idem.
3. Breach of Contract-An owner, who, on the default of a build- ing contractor completes the work, under the provisions of the contract permitting him to do so, and to deduct the cost from the amount due the contractor, has the same right to reimburse himself out of the amount reserved during the pro- gress of the work by the contractor against the holders of mechanic's liens as against the contractor himself.-Beach & Weld v. Wakefield, 567.
Equitable Interests - Foreclosure - A mechanic's lien may attach to an equitable interest in real property, and when foreclosed the decree is a lien thereon.-Sheppard v. Mes- senger, 717.
5. Estoppel-A material man stated to a house owner, while the house was unfinished, that the principal contractor "had paid all his bills as he had paid them last winter,-when the build- ings were finished." Held, that this did not estop him from asserting his lien for material furnished the contractor.-Green Bay Lumber Co. v. Adams, 672.
6. Incumbrancers -The maker of a note held by a bank then in liquidation obtained its surrender by reason of the fact that Small figures refer to subdivisions of Index. The others to page of report.
the president of the bank paid the note either in cash or by a charge to his account which had sufficient to its credit. The maker of the surrendered note gave the president new notes payable on demand and secured them by mortgage. Held. a. The president acted for himself and not as trustee for the bank.
b. While by reason of the taking of demand notes, there was no extension of time, yet the new notes did not secure or evidence an antecedent debt, and they rested on sufficient consideration to bring their holder within the rights of incumbrancers for valuable consideration under the mech- anics's lien law.-McGillivary v. Case, 17.
7. Railroads-A builder constructing a union depot for a terminal railway and warehouse corporation, which was a railroad with- in the statute, and where the building of such depot was the real and primary purpose of the corporation's organization, has a mechanic's lien on the corporation's entire railroad pro- perty, prior to incumbrances and liens accruing subsequent to the beginning of the work.-Beach & Weld v. Wakefield, 567. 8. Subcontractors--Where a house owner, knowing that a mater- ial man was furnishing material for which he had not been paid, and having funds due the contractor sufficient to pay the duly-perfected lien for material, pays the contractor in advance and also other subcontractors, who had not filed their liens, he is liable for the amount of the material man's lien.-Green Bay Lumber Co. v. Adams, 672.
MISJOINDER-See PRACT., 22 MISTAKE--See JUDGMENT, 3, 12.
MORTALITY TABLES-See EVID., 27.
MORTGAGES-See ADJUD., 2; CORP., 3,4,5; INSTRUC., ; GEN. ASSIGN., 1,3,4,9; NOTES AND BILLS, 2; PLEADING, 12; PROBATE JUR.; RAIL., 22.
1. Foreclosure-ATTORNEY'S FEES-A mortgage providing that it shall secure, in addition to the principal debt, all sums in any way to become due, including attorney's fees, does not include sums due for services of a stranger in trying to obtain an extension of the mortgage, where he is unsuccessful.— Steckel & Sons v. Standley, 694.
2. SAME-Nor does it secure a stranger performing services, as against a purchaser of the land, though the stranger after- wards acquires the mortgage.-Idem.
3. SAME-A chattel mortgagee is not entitled to expenses of a trip to foreclose a mortgage, which he does not show to be neces- sary or reasonable.—In re Windhorst, 58.
Small figures refer to subdivisions of Index. The others to page of report.
4. DEFENSES-Waiver-The fact that a purchaser withholds a por- tion of the price claimed by the mortgagee, as security against the claim does not prevent him from disputing the validity of the claim.-Steckel & Son v. Standly, 694.
5. INSTALLMENTS NOT DUE-Though a decree in foreclosure may preserve a lien for installments not due, yet plaintiff may not make his lien for installments not due senior to those due, and sell subject to the senior lien. He must sell sufficient only to satisfy installments due, or sell the whole, and look to the sur- plus to satisfy installments not due.-Kilmer v. Gallaher, 676. 6. TENDER-A tender to a mortgagee of the amount due on the mortgage is kept good although no money was paid to the clerk of the district court in pursuance thereof because the latter preferred a certificate of deposit, where the money was at all times subject to his order and under his control.-Steckel v. Standley, 694.
7. Waiver A mortgagee waives his right to insist that the money owing on the mortgage be produced where the owner of the property subject to the mortgage offered to pay the amount due and could have produced it within a few minutes and offered to do so but was assured by the former that the money would not be accepted unless his alleged claim was paid in full.-Idem.
8. Recording - Notice - A recorded chattel mortgage does not impart constructive notice where the only description is by reference to the names of the various items of machinery cov- ered by the amount apportioned to each, without any statement as to the possession, ownership, or location, or other things to aid in its identification.-Iowa Lumber Co. v. Cassidy & Bro., 564.
9. Settlement by Debtor-A mortgagee may complain of a fraudulent settlement between the mortgagor and the holder of a mechanic's lien paramount to the mortgage whereby the amount of the lien is fixed at a sum in excess of that actually due. Beach & Weld v. Wakefield, 567.
10. Tacking-A valid claim not secured by mortgage at the time of a purchase of real property cannot be tacked to the mortgage debt and made a lien upon the property by the purchase of the mortgage after the title to the property has vested in the pur- chaser although the latter retains a portion of the purchase price on account of the claim, not because it was conceded to be due but as security against liability therefor.-Steckel & Son v. Standley, 694.
MOTIONS-See JUDGMENT, 12; PRACT.,
Small figures refer to subdivisions of Index. The others to page of report.
MOTION AND DEMURRER-See ADJUD., 1; PLEAD., 9,10;
MULCT LAW-See INTOX. LIQ., 1,2; TAXATION, 3,*.
MUNICIPAL CORPORATION--See BONDS, 1, 2; EVID., 16, 30; CONSTITUTIONAL LAW, 4; LIM. ACTIONS, 1; NEGLI., ; OFFICE AND OFFICERS, 1, 2; TAXATION, 1 2 3 567 8 9
1. Debt--A contract for a street improvement under which a city agrees to pay a specific sum at a stated time is a debt within the constitutional inhibition against incurring indebtedness in excess of five per cent. of the value of its taxable property, where the contractors are under no obligation to accept the proceeds of local assessment bonds or the amount derived from such assessments on abutting property, and the city has no funds which it can lawfully use to meet the payments as they fall due under the contract, and has issued bonds and levied assessments to reimburse itself for the amount to be paid to the contractors.--Allen v. City, 90.
2. Constitutional Limit — Money raised to pave one street be- comes a trust fund, and if used on another street a debt is made to that trust fund. If the debt so made exceeds the con- stitutional limit, a paving assessment to reimburse the city for the trust money and bonds for that purpose, payable out of a special paving tax, are both invalid, and no paving contract may be made looking to such reimbursement.-Idem
3. Order of Payment-The income of each year must be used to pay debts of that year, to the exclusion of prior warrants issued, presented for payment and endorsed "Unpaid for want of funds."-Phillips v. Reed, 331.
4. PRIORITIES-Code, section 660, providing that warrants when presented to the city treasurer, if not paid for want of funds, shall be endorsed by that officer with the date of presentation, and paid in order thereof, applies only as between warrants issued in a given year.--Idem.
Contract-PAVING-The statute making it incumbent on a city to establish the grade of a street before paving it does not pre- clude the city from ordering the paving and making the con- tract therefor before it has established the grade, where the contract is made with reference to a pro osed grade, which is established before any work is done.-Allen v. City, 90. SAME-A contract by a city with a paving contractor requiring the contractor to replace defective work at any time within two years, and providing that, if he fails to do so, the city may replace it and recover the expense of him and his bondsmen, Small figures refer to subdivisions of Index. The others to page of report.
« PreviousContinue » |