Page images
PDF
EPUB
[graphic]

APPR JATION TITLE: CONSTRUCTION GENERAL

cn
GLASS!7ICATION. Local Protection (Flood Control)

Buffalo Bayou and Tributaries, Tex.
SUNSARY CC.STIRUCTIO I PROG.XAS (P3-1). (Continuing)

FKSAL YEARS 1961 & 1962

PROJECT COST
ITEM

TOTAL TO
CURRENT

BALANCE TO

BUDGET
ESTINATE
30 JUNE 19 60 FISCAL YEAR 1961 FISCAL YEAR 1962

COMPLETE
AFTER FY 1962

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]
[graphic][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][ocr errors][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][ocr errors][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed]
[graphic][subsumed][ocr errors][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed]

Mr. BOLAND. This shows a request for fiscal 1962 of $3,500,000. It also shows that the Federal cost on this project has gone up $1,900,000, but the local interests cost has gone down by $2,200,000.

How does this happen? Why is this so?

General FLEMING. The increase in the Federal cost is due to higher price levels, and about $1 million for restoration of complete and partially complete reaches damaged by heavy rains and prolonged wet weather conditions. About $228,000 due to more detailed planning and design, and $240,000 for engineering and design, and supervision and administration.

The decrease in the local contribution is the amount they have been able to save themselves on the road relocations. In other words, the decrease in the local contribution is the decrease on their actual experience of expenses on the purchase of land and making of relocations.

Mr. BOLAND. Are there any questions?
Mr. Kirwan. I have none.

CANYON RESERVOIR

Mr. BOLAND. Canyon Reservoir on page 161. Mr. Reporter, will you please insert at this point pages 161 through 166.

(Pp. 161 through 166 of the justifications are as follows:)

CANYON RESERVOIR, TEXAS

(Continuing)

ICCATION: In Comal County, Texas, on the Guadalupe River, 303 miles above its mouth, and 12 airline

miles northwest of New Braunfels, Texas.
AT::02I ZATION: 1945 River and Harbor Act as modified BENEFIT-COST RATIO: 3.5 to 1
by the Flood Control Act of 1954.

Accumulated

% of Est.
SUMMARI ZED FINANCIAL DATA

Fed. Cost
2's:12ted Federal Cost

$17,300,000 (1) Appropriations to 30 June 1960 $5,117,000
Es imated Non-Federal Cost

1,400,000 , Appropriations for FY 1961 2.900.000
Cash Contribution $1,400,000 (1)

Appropriations to Date

8,017,000
Other Costs

Appropriations Requested for
Total Estimated Project Cost $18,700,000

FY 1962

3,000,000
Balance to complete After
YY 1962

6,283,000
(1) Local interests are required to reimburse the Federal Government for costs allocated to conservation and

stream flow regulation storage over a period not to exceed 50 years after the amount of reimbursement is
determined, and with a minimum caso contribution of $1,400,000 during construction. The total reimburse-
ment cannot be determined until the increase in aet regulated stream flow resulting from the storage has
been measured following project completion.

PHYSICAL DATA
Dam:

Reservoir Capacity:
Type ....Rolled Earth Pill

Plood Control ...

· 346,400 acre-feet
Height .. 224 feet (maximum above stream bed)

Water Supply and/or
Length ..6,830 feet (including 1,160 feet

Stream Flow Regulation.... 366,400 acre-feet
of dikes and 1,260 ft. spillway)

Sedimentation......

28, 100 acre-feet Total

740,900 acre-feet Spillway:

Type Uncontrolled - broadcrested weir
Length ... 1,260 feet
Design Capacity Maximum Pool) 502,800 cubic feet

per second

« PreviousContinue »