Page images
PDF
EPUB
[graphic]

KEEP THE
THE DOOR-CHAIN UP!

BRITANNIA (GOING OUT OF TOWN). "NOW, PAM, THERE ARE A GREAT MANY BAD CHARACTERS ABOUT JUST
NOW; MIND YOU LOOK OUT WELL-AND ALWAYS KEEP THE DOOR-CHAIN UP!"

GEESE AND GANDERS.

THE BEST OF SERVANTS.

IF you would wish to have a good servantE quote from the reone that is faithful, honest, and attentive, and port of a meeting of whom you will never quarrel with; one that will Society Masons," renever bother you for wages, nor drink your wine lative to the Strike, a behind your back; one that will never object to rather good thing, wear the clothes you have been wearing yourself, which was said by a nor make a fuss over what meals you give him; member of the asso-one that will not grumble if you keep him up ciation:half the night; one to whom you could at any time give with a clear conscience the very best of characters; one that will never wish to leave you, but would rather he remained with you all the days of your life, then you must be Your Own Servant-and that is best achieved by your diligently learning how on all occasions to help yourself.-The Hermit of the Haymarket.

"JOSEPH TURNER. It's an old adage that what is good for the goose is good for the gander.'

[graphic]

Combined

against

each other, recipro-
cating injury, and mu.
tually suffering and in-
flicting loss, the work-
men on the one hand,
and the masters on the
other, do certainly ex-
hibit themselves under
circumstances which
render them peculiarly
comparable, respec-
tively, to ganders and
geese. In reference to
both sides MR. TUR-
NER was very happy in
the remark that what
is good for the goose
is good for the gander.
He would, however,
have been much hap-
pier if he had observed
that what was bad for
the goose was bad for
the gander, and if

employers and employed could perceive that combination is equally bad for gander and for goose, it would be happy for all parties.

A CONCORDAT IN THE HOUSE OF COMMONS. THAT Special statesman the O'DONOGHUE, the other evening, in a brilliant speech, most luminously pointed out a tremendous mistake under which LORD PALMERSTON and LORD JOHN RUSSELL have been labouring throughout their respective careers. Erin's bright particular star, before whose name the definite article stands for Mr., is reported to have said that

"The noble Lord at the head of the Government and the noble Minister for Foreign Affairs were still in pursuit of a phantom which had been the fixed idea of all their lives. That idea was ostensibly the destruction of the temporal power of the POPE, while in reality they had sought the destruction of the Catholic religion all over the world. (Hear.)"

Hibernia's distinguished son also administered a fine rebuke to MR. GLADSTONE:

"He had listened with great pain to the speech of the CHANCELLOR OF THE EXCHEQUER, (hear, hear!) and as one who professed the Catholic religion, he should be sorry to have to sit on the same side of the house with, or even near to that right honourable gentleman. (Hear, hear, and a laugh.)"

The laugh was probably a tribute to the humour which insinuated MR. GLADSTONE to be a pestilent heretic. Heresy, so rank as that of the ultra Protestant representative of Oxford, the O'DONOGHUE jocosely treated as contagious. Of course he could not have seriously feared that he might contract the disease himself in consequence of going too near the infected Minister, although, by pitching into that great Homeric scholar, he ran some risk of catching it. However, as it was, he utterly demolished him, by the subjoined crushing refutation:

"The right honourable gentleman said, at least in effect, that the people of the Papal dominions were chained to the earth. Now, that was not true. It was a statement which was not founded in fact. It was contradicted by the condition of the people, and every one who was acquainted with or had travelled in those dominions must admit that, in a temporal sense, there did not exist in the world a more popular Sovereign than PIUS THE NINTH. (Hear, and a laugh.)"

Of course this shut up MR. GLADSTONE, but not only that; it also enforced conviction on LORD JOHN himself, whom we find subsequently making the following remarkable concession, and confession of faitha faith which the O'DONOGHUE will of course recognise as the faith, or, in other words, the cheese:

"I believe that if you allow the people of Italy to settle their own concerns (hear, hear), and that is the doctrine which my noble friend and myself have always

For a Poet's Critic.
THE Idylls a rhymester asperses-
O Public, rejoice and be glad!
If he were not abusing good verses,
He'd be busily writing some bad.

A "Nom de Guerre."

FRANCE can boast of its MONSIEUR TROPLONG, and can also rejoice now in its MONSIEUR TROPTARD-for such is the name that has recently been conferred on PRINCE NAPOLEON, in of always arriving a day after the battle. consequence of the unfortunate habit he has

A Conscience-Conundrum.

WE beg to acknowledge the receipt of the following conscience-conundrum from the CHANCELLOR OF THE EXCHEQUER:

Q. What form of currency is most used, when a person
A. (S) Cents!!!

has to pay money through the nose?

held in this house, especially during the whole course of the present Session-if you allow the people of Italy, whether they have hitherto lived under the rule of the KING OF SARDINIA, or of the GRAND DUKE OF TUSCANY, or of the DUKE OF MODENA, under the POPE, or under the KING OF THE TWO SICILIES, to settle with their Sovereigns on what terms they shall pay their allegiance, there will no longer exist the irritation and discontent which has long prevailed, but they will proceed with peace and order to establish the foundations of good Government."

What articles of belief can be more satisfactory to the O'DONOGHUE than the foregoing Credo? LORD JOHN RUSSELL believes that the subjects of the POPE ought to be left to settle their own affairs with their Sovereign. The O'DONOGHUE says that PIUS THE NINTH is as popular a Sovereign as any in the world. What better plan then for maintaining the POPE'S Sovereignty can he imagine than that of allowing it simply to rest on the broad and firm basis of popularity? The withdrawal of all foreign troops, therefore, from the papal states, will as exactly effect the end desired by the O'DONOGHUE as it will answer the purpose of LORD JOHN RUSSELL.

[merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small]

THE SERPENTINE THROUGH A SIEVE.

our great fashionable pond is to be carried out, it will be necessary to consume the muddy remainder by some more expeditious means, if OME slight inconve- it cannot be sweetened by the aid of science. nience is likely to Let a sufficient number of ducks be provided to attend the ingenious eat up all the mud, a measure which every old plan for cleansing woman and every child knows will prove infalthe Serpentine advo-lible. The birds will soon pay their expenses: cated, and about to Bayswater will smell of nothing worse than sage be adopted, by MR. and onions; and SIR JOSEPH PAXTON will acknowFITZROY. If the Ser-ledge the mistake he made in opposing the grand pentine is to be fil-project for purifying the Serpentine.

[graphic]

tered, and there is
any filth in the Ser-
pentine, the filth must
collect on the filter.

evolve a few rather

Modern chemistry enables the perfumer

ONE HUMBUG THE LESS.

regu

If the filter is to WE are glad to state, that one little concession occupy nearly an acre has been paid to the British Press, by the removal of ground, a great of an absurd form that was of no legal, or moral, quantity of filth will good whatever. Formerly there existed a mock be deposited on a ceremony that imposed on a paper the necessity considerable surface. of making out securities to the extent of £300 or If this extent of filth £500, and the trouble consequent on that is to be occasionally lation was almost endless. Many a name of a exposed to the sun, respectable referee had to be given before the it will reek a little, punctilious official would be satisfied with his nasty gases in certain solvency. This exaction of security was all the more nonsensical, inasmuch as Somerset House quantities, and per- never by any accident gave credit. Not a penny haps engender some stamp would it advance, in spite of all your secufever. rities, unless the penny was previously laid down now informs us that this harassing process has on the counter for it. The Connaught Patriot to extract the sweet-been done away with; and we beg most unfeignest scents from the edly to compliment Somerset House on the wonfoulest dregs, dross, derful display of good sense that has prompted sediment, sweepings, the removal. It is so much the less red tape in rubbish, lees, refuse, and unspeakable orts. one of our government offices. All parties will move and breathe the more freely for being The residuary stuff relieved of the useless trammel. After all, the of gas-works, the real security of the press is in the truth, talent, nasty pitch and tar, and their graveolent kindred hydrocarbons, may, however, be men- and respectability with which it is conducted. tioned. Perhaps some profound chemist will inform MR. FITZROY of a process by which The public are the best judges and guardians for the mud of the Serpentine, collected on a filter, may be, not, indeed, deodorised, but trans- seeing that those conditions are always conscienmuted into an odoriferous substance, which may be carted away in the day-time, diffusing tiously complied with, and they know how to a fragrance like that of jessamine, violets, syringa, or otto of roses. First, however, catch your fish. Collect your filth-if the Serpentine contains any. MR. tenancing the paper that does not act up inflict the heaviest penalty by no longer counSTEPHENSON seems to think, not much :honourably to the spirit of them. A warning, far more effectual than any that could emanate from a minister's office, is a falling circulation.

"He was in the habit of riding almost daily by that river, and he must say that during the last three or four years he had perceived nothing so offensive to his olfactory nerves as to lead him to coincide in the outcry which had recently been raised. (Hear, hear.) He believed the outcry was entirely unfounded, because, whatever the state of the Serpentine had been, it was not now to the best of his judgment in an offensive condition."

Perhaps, MR. STEPHENSON, because, as Grandmother Shandy observed, "you have little or no nose, Sir." The Serpentine looks, at least, like soup, if it has no smell. MR. FITZROY, however, is catching his fish, according to the continued statement of our eminent engineer:

"Supposing, however, that the water was impure, the question was, how the nuisance should be remedied. The Serpentine was a stagnant lake (hear), and the other day, in riding along the banks, he observed that a quantity of lime was being poured into the water. The consequence of this proceeding was, that he saw dead fish floating on the surface, and occasioning the most offensive decomposition."

[ocr errors]

Thus, MR. FITZROY is turning the water of the Serpentine into limewater, and killing all the fish. So that he is catching his fish both literally and figuratively; he is poisoning the roach and dace, and creating filth in the Serpentine; dead fish, occasioning, as MR. STEPHENSON says, the most offensive decomposition," and doubtless exhaling a most ancient and fish-like smell." If there had been no filth in the Serpentine, there was no occasion to put any lime in it, particularly since the lime causes more filth than it cures. The same circumstance may be considered to render steam-pumps and filtering-tanks unnecessary. According to MR. FITZROY :

"Two questions which were quite independent of one another had been mixed up in this discussion, the first relating to the mud at the bottom of the river, and the second with respect to the water itself."

In discussing tea, two questions are, in exactly the same manner, mixed up, which are as entirely independent of each other as the water of the Serpentine and the mud at the bottom of it. The tea is mixed up with the hot water which is poured thereon, although the tea-leaves have settled at the bottom of the tea-pot. Infusion after infusion of hot water at length extracts all the goodness of the tea; and in the same way, MR. FITZROY appears to think, washing after washing will remove all the nastiness of the Serpentine. Some time may be occupied in this process, as the dirty bed of the Serpentine is to be washed by driblets, with its own filtered water.

In preference to filtering the Serpentine, MR. FITZROY might, perhaps, as well leave it alone, and, instead of throwing lime into it, stock it with eels. They would assimilate its organic impurities, which, in the substance of eel, might ultimately appear in the shape of stew, or spitchcock, affording abundant nutriment to thousands. But if the filtration of

A MILD COURT, MARTIAL. THE following, from the "Military and Naval Intelligence" in the Times, is a remarkable sentence. It is the sentence of a Court Martial on one HENRY PRESTON, a Sapper of the Royal Engineers, for desertion:

"The Court, in consideration of his former character, sentenced him to be marked on the body with the letter

D,' and to be imprisoned in Fort Clarence for 56 days."

Eight weeks imprisonment for desertion is a merciful punishment; and instead of having been merely marked with a letter on his body, Sapper PRESTON might have had his back scored with fifty lashes. He certainly had very lenient judges, the rather inasmuch as he was sentenced to be marked with "D" for Deserter, in consideration of his former character!

An Extravagant Notion. CIVILITY, they say, costs nothing, and yet looking at the Civil Estimates, and the enormous sums annually disposed of under them, we should say that it was a very expensive article. It is fortunate that they are "Civil," or else perhaps JOHN BULL would not put up so quietly with them. We have always noticed that when it comes to a question of spending money, what a remarkably Civil Estimate Ministers do take of poor old JOHN, to be sure!

WOMAN WEIGHED IN THE SCALES OF
JUSTICE.

THE Queen's Bench and the Common Pleas did last week in their several Courts show to a most thinking and, withal, most commercial people, how nicely-as though the article was gold-dust-the worth of woman is weighed in the scales of British justice. The wife of the free-born Briton is his property. Imagine the bride in all the lustre of her bridal attire, in all the delicacy and, it may be added, in all the fragility. Is she not like one of those lovely oriental vases, all flowers without, and breathing otto of roses? Well, the bridegroom is the happy possessor of one of these vessels. A malicious or mischievous fellow flaws it-breaks it. The owner of the china brings his action against the evil-doer, and the offence proved, the value of the broken china is assessed to its owner. And is it not, right and just that it should be so?

A man's heart is flawed; for the wife that dwelt there has been wickedly, maliciously taken thence, From that hour that human heart is of no more worth than a cracked domestic teapot. The man, with all the determination of a bold Briton, sues for damages for the heart broken, and the woman-the household fairy that dwelt there-spirited away. A jury of bold Britons weigh the worth of the woman in the shop-keeping scales of justice, and estimate her worth at so many pounds. Is not this beautifully commercial? Nevertheless, we think we can even suggest an improvement of the trading custom.

Why, since the offence is purely of the commercial kind; why, since the compensation is, at least in the law-courts, purely material, why should not the scales of justice be devoted to a still more just, still more equitable duty of balance? Would it not be equally wise, equally moral with our present way of affording so much money for the loss of a wife-(MR. HOPE consents to take the small sum of £200 of COUNT AGUADO for MRS. HOPE)-to weigh, not the peace of mind of the husband in the balance, but the person of the wife herself? Let the woman herself be weighed, and of course the price would vary according to the rank and breeding of the weighed one-be paid for according to pounds avoirdupois. Thus, the lightness of the woman would be judged according to her density. We feel strengthened in the good sense, in the morality (according to law courts) of the suggestion. Is not a wife "flesh of flesh and bone of bone" of her husband? Well, let her be, in propria persona-with allowed millinery drawbacks-weighed in the scales of justice; and the price previously fixed at avoirdupois rate, the price be paid to her late owner.

We are in no fear that, with this custom duly introduced and sanctioned, the lines of beauty would be made to describe too wide a curve. We know that in Morocco, maidens are only deemed by those about to marry, proportionably eligible as they are disproportionably fat. Hence, it is written of Tunisian mothers that, in their natural care to obtain good husbands for their daughters, they will cran the doves like turkies; standing over them with a bamboo, the while they compel the maidens to eat, and eat, and still to eat of kous-kous, a most fattening compost of curds, and honey, and corn; that has as ready an effect upon maidens of Morocco, as oil-cake has upon short-horns of Hereford. We know this. Still we know that we are free, civilised, moral Britons; and do therefore disdain to dream of the possible introduction of kous-kous into May-Fair or Belgravia. Our English laws of divorce must again and again be debated; and we do think so long as the loss of the wife of a man's bosom is to be paid for, even as one of his most domestic chattels maliciously broken we do think that our suggestion of weighing a woman and paying for her, according to avoirdupois, and not according to any moral standard, is a great commercial improvement on our present system.

In the case, however, of "HOPE v. AGUADO," the plaintiff did not want money for money's sake. He only wanted the filthy lucre, as so much yellow dirt, so much fuller's-earth, wherewith he might-by the after grace of the House of Lords-take out the stains of his marriage lines. He could get a divorce, if he got a verdict of decent nominal amount; and upon this understanding the court was merciful to the sinful defendant, and thought-"in pursuance of an arrangement previously entered into "-that £200 damages would suffice. We may now leave MR. HOPE on his way to the Lords; where, having the money necessary to pay for the operation, he will have his marriage manacle for ever cut in twain. All future peace attend him!

We now come to "BROUGH. WOODHATCH," disposed of the same day in the Common Pleas. We will not linger upon it, for the story is too terrible. BROUGH obtains a verdict, the damages to be assessed by MR. SERGEANT CHANNELL. But can the unhappy, outraged BROUGH obtain a severance from the marriage chain that still holds him to a horrid creature in Bedlam? No: he must go to the grave with that chain still corroding him. And wherefore? Why, broken-hearted, poor man, he is too poor to pay the fees in the House of Lords.

Nevertheless, English justice with sedatest face declares from the Bench that in merry, equitable England-"There is only one law for the rich and for the poor." Any way there are two separate churches, two distinct marriage services. In the church of ST. JAMES there is

divorce, for ST. GILES life-long bondage: How long is this one-sided law for the rich and the poor to continue?

One suggestion to law; or if law be deaf, to common sense. Might not the verdict for the plaintiff be at the same time, the verdict of divorce?

THE PARKS AND THE PARK KEEPERS.

41

Or the less admiring the splendid uniforms of the individuals acting as Park Keepers of the Metropolitan Parks, we cannot help regretting that the useful is not blended with the ornamental in the persons of those functionaries. During the prevalence of snow, efforts were made to remove it from all public footways, except from those footways which the public had especially the right to call their own, and accordingly the road from the Horse Guards to Hyde. Park Corner was about as bad as the road from Balaklava to the Camp before Sebastopol. Of course it

[graphic]

could not be expected that those magnificent creatures in green and gold, who hold the office of Park Keeper, could take a shovel or a broom in hand to clear a footway for passengers; but it is a pity that some one was not employed to prevent people from having to either walk up to the knees in snow, or cut trenches for themselves to get from one side of the Park to the other.

We should like to know whether it was routine and red-tape that prevented the removal of the snow in the Parks, and whether the scavenger was referred from one department to another before he could get to work.

A few energetic crossing-sweepers would have rapidly effected a clearance of the pathways, which for some days were either impassable or dangerous, while the Park Keepers were discussing the prospects of the war, as we overheard two of them doing in company with a Policeman, who was entering into a description of the "sort of man that's wanted in the Crimea."

We should like to see a copy of the instructions given to the Park Keepers, whose duties, as far as we have seen, would seem to consist in walking together in couples, and discussing the topics of the day, varied by an occasional charge on some very little boys, who may be playing at some harmless game. We have seen some prodigies of activity performed occasionally by a Park Keeper, under the influence of a sort of paidophobia, or aversion to boyhood.

We have sometimes seen children while playing quite at a distance from the public footpaths, suddenly routed by the incursion of a barbarian Beadle, who has savagely put the whole party to the cane, and returned after his achievement, to renew, with his colleague, the chat in which he had been engaged. We must confess we think the functionary in question would have been better employed in sweeping the snow from the footpaths, than he occasionally is in sweeping off the children from the grass, of which there is not a great deal within the reach of these erratic juveniles.

[merged small][merged small][ocr errors][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small]
[ocr errors]
« PreviousContinue »