Wills, Trusts, and Estates
All the great features you've come to expect in previous editions are here! Along with expertly selected cases, this superb revision delivers comprehensive coverage and a flexible organization with chapters that can be easily rearranged or omitted to fit every instructor's preferences. Written with the lively intelligence that has made this book so popular, "Wills, Trusts, and Estates", Sixth Edition provides exactly what a course in estates and trusts should offer to students: engaging lessons in thinking critically about problems in family wealth transmission.
The Distinctly Different Casebook
-- Clear, concise text -- combined with witty and insightful notes -- make this a casebook that students love to read
-- Cases that hold students' interest, illustrate concepts, and make the material extremely accessible -- evidence of the authors' legendary talent for selecting effective cases
-- Comprehensiveness and flexibility of coverage give you the freedom to choose precisely which material you want to teach -- and in the topic sequence that you prefer
-- Solid, practical models of wills and trusts help students build the competence they will require as practitioners in the estates and trusts field
-- Brilliant problems and questions encourage and guide students in considering and comparing alternative solutions to problems in family wealth transmission
-- An examination of historical roots, where appropriate, gives students a better understanding of some peculiarities of modern law and of the continuing growth of the law
-- An outstanding Teacher's Manual contains answers to all problems and offers additional insights on cases
Results 1-3 of 78
first plaintiff and a daughter who is in America. The defendant has a daughter by
her first marriage, a Miss Berenson. Most of the relevant events took place in
1964; and I do not think any witness can really be expected to remember the
Jimenez v. Lee Supreme Court of Oregon, 1976 274 Or. 457, 547 P.2d 126 O'
CONNELL, C.J. This is a suit brought by plaintiff against her father to compel him
to account for assets which she alleges were held by defendant as trustee for her.
corresponded with the plaintiff about making delivery to it of the library. In
September, 1954, she wrote the president of the plaintiff that she had decided to
ship the library and collection, but that it was not to be unpacked unless she was