What was Mark for Matthew?: An Examination of Matthew's Relationship and Attitude to His Primary Source
The Gospel of Mark appears to have been an overnight success in earliest Christian circles, inspiring and influencing two later evangelists to compose their own accounts of the life of Jesus. Matthew provides us with the first evidence of the reception of the Markan gospel, and is thus the closest we can come to knowing how Mark was understood by first-century Christians. What does Matthew's re-working of the gospel of Mark tell us about his relationship and attitude to this important Christian text? J. Andrew Doole examines Matthew's sources, which the evangelist used to compile and compose his own story of Jesus. Doole suggests that Matthew was not disputing the Gospel of Mark, rather developing its tradition in a conventional manner to reinforce its authoritative position in the growing Christian movement.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
account of Jesus ancient Aramaic argues Christology citations composition conﬂation continues DAVIES & ALLISON disciples discourse discussion early Christian edition of Mark evangelist Evangelium evidence explains Farrer Hypothesis ﬁrst follows Mark Galilee Gospel of Mark Gospel of Matthew GOULDER Greek HENGEL ibid inﬂuence Jewish John Josephus Judaism Judaization Judas KLOPPENBORG literary literature logia logion Luke’s Mark and Matthew Mark and Q Mark's Mark’s Gospel Markan account Markan tradition Markus Mattha'us Matthean Matthew and Luke Matthew follows Matthew’s gospel Matthieu Midrash ministry miracles O’LEARY omission omits oral traditions Papias parables Passion Paul Paulus pericope Peter Pharisees portrait provides Pseudo-Philo Q traditions Quintilian Qumran quotations redaction criticism redactor reference reﬂect rfid rﬁg roig rtbv Schrift scribes scriptures Sermon simply sinsv sources STANTON story suggests synoptic synoptic problem T]he teaching Temple Scroll theological thew Torah words writing written