The Press Effect: Politicians, Journalists, and the Stories that Shape the Political World
Oxford University Press, 2003 - Language Arts & Disciplines - 220 pages
Was the 2000 presidential campaign merely a contest between Pinocchio and Dumbo? And did Dumbo miraculously turn into Abraham Lincoln after the events of September 11? In fact, Kathleen Hall Jamieson and Paul Waldman argue in The Press Effect, these stereotypes, while containing some elements of the truth, represent the failure of the press and the citizenry to engage the most important part of our political process in a critical fashion. Jamieson and Waldman analyze bothpress coverage and public opinion, using the Annenberg 2000 survey, which interviewed more than 100,000 people, to examine one of the most interesting periods of modern presidential history, from the summer of 2000 through the aftermath of September 11th. How does the press fail us during presidential elections? Jamieson and Waldman show that when political campaigns side-step or refuse to engage the facts of the opposing side, the press often fails to step into the void with the information citizens require to make sense of the political give-and-take. They look at the stories through which we understand political events--examining a number of fabrications that deceived the public about consequential governmental activities--and explorethe ways in which political leaders and reporters select the language through which we talk and think about politics, and the relationship between the rhetoric of campaigns and the reality of governance. They explore the role of the campaigns and the press in casting the 2000 general election as acontest between Pinocchio and Dumbo, and ask whether in 2000 the press applied the same standards of truth-telling to both Bush and Gore. The unprecedented events of election night and the thirty-six days that followed revealed the role that preconceptions play in press interpretation and the importance of press frames in determining the tone of political coverage as well as the impact of network overconfidence in polls. The Press Effect is, ultimately, a wide-ranging critique of the press's role in mediating between politicians and the citizens they are supposed to serve.
What people are saying - Write a review
The press effect: politicians, journalists, and the stories that shape the political worldUser Review - Not Available - Book Verdict
Amateur psychologist, soothsayer, patriot-these are some of the roles adopted by journalists in covering political news, according to Jamieson and Waldman (Annenberg Public Policy Ctr.). By forcing ... Read full review
Other editions - View all
absentee accepted actually American answer appeared argue arguments asked assumed attacks attempt ballots believe Bill Bush Bush campaign Bush's campaign candidates cast citizens claim close conclusion count coverage critical David debate decision Democrats describe discussion effect election evidence example fact failed families Florida frame George going Gore Gore's governor hand House important interpretation issue journalists later lead less majority mean Michigan military narrative networks night noted November October offered officials overseas Pennsylvania person play political polls president presidential question raised reason recount reporters Republicans response rhetoric role Security Senate September 11 shows speech standard statement story Sunday Supreme Court tell tion true truth United Vice President vote voters Washington Post week York