The Politics of Neurodiversity: Why Public Policy Matters
How can society best respond to people with atypical neurological development? Should we concentrate on providing medical care, or on ensuring civil rights? Addressing these questions, Dana Lee Baker offers a provocative analysis of the ways that intersecting agendas┐prevention, civil rights, providing specialized care, and celebrating disability culture┐compete to make disability rights policy. The result is a thoughtful and timely consideration of the tensions shaping all quarters of disability advocacy.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Securing Civil Rights vs Providing Care
Securing Civil Rights vs Finding a Cure
Securing Civil Rights vs Celebrating Diversity
3 other sections not shown
ability activities adults agenda types appeared argument associated atypical autism awareness become care-oriented cause celebration celebration-oriented challenges characteristics child comes concern connected considered context continue course create cultural cure deinstitutionalization described designed direct disability policy disability policy subsystems discourse surrounding discussion disease disorder diversity early effective efforts employed engaged especially example exclusion exists expected experience explained fact focused functional differences Furthermore given goals human increased individuals with disabilities individuals with neurological infrastructures institutions interests involves issue least less limited lives major mental nature neurodiversity neurological differences organizations parents particularly person political discourse population positive potential practice programs public and political public discourse question represents rest result social society specific stakeholders statement studies surrounding tend tensions tion treatment typically understandings United