The Nature of Explanation
In his brilliant and tragically brief career, Kenneth Craik anticipated certain ideas which since his death in 1945 have found wide acceptance. As one of the first to realise that machines share with the brain certain principles of functioning, Craik was a pioneer in the development of physiological psychology and cybernetics. Craik published only one complete work of any length, this essay on The Nature of Explanation. Here he considers thought as a term for the conscious working of a highly complex machine, viewing the brain as a calculating machine which can model or parallel external events, a process that is the basic feature of thought and explanation. He applies this view to a number of psychological and philosophical problems (such as paradox and illusion) and suggests possible experiments to test his theory. This book is of interest to those concerned with the concepts of brain and mind.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Relational and descriptive theories
CHAPTER S Hypothesis on the nature of thought
Methods of testing this hypothesis
action actual analogy appears apply argument assert attempt behaviour brain calculating causal causes CHAPTER combination completely concepts connected consciousness consider consistent correct definite describe determined difficulty direction effects electrons energy evidence existence experience experimental explanation express external fact failed feeling final function fundamental further give given greater hypothesis idea identity implication important indicate instance interaction involved kind knowledge language laws less limit logical machine material matter meaning mechanism method mind nature nervous system neural objects observation occur parallel particular patterns perception perhaps phenomena philosophical physical physicists position possible postulates precise predict present principle probability problems processes produce proof properties prove reality reason recognition regard relation represent response result seems sense similar simple space statement suggested surely symbolism theory things thought tion true ultimate whole