The End Of Capitalism (As We Knew It): A Feminist Critique of Political Economy

Front Cover
U of Minnesota Press, Mar 24, 2006 - Political Science - 348 pages
In the mid-1990s, at the height of academic discussion about the inevitability of capitalist globalization, J. K. Gibson-Graham presented a groundbreaking and controversial argument for envisioning alternative economies. This new edition includes an introduction in which the authors address critical responses to The End of Capitalism and outline the economic research and activism they have been engaged in since the book was first published.

“Paralyzing problems are banished by this dazzlingly lucid, creative, and practical rethinking of class and economic transformation.” —Meaghan Morris, Lingnan University, Hong Kong

“Profoundly imaginative.” —Eve Kosofsky Sedgwick, City University of New York “Filled with insights, it is clearly written and well supported with good examples of actual, deconstructive practices.” —International Journal of Urban and Regional Research

J. K. Gibson-Graham is the pen name of Katherine Gibson and Julie Graham, feminist economic geographers who work, respectively, at the Australian National University in Canberra and the University of Massachusetts Amherst.
 

Contents

Chapter 1 Strategies
1
An Encounter in Contradiction
24
Chapter 3 Class and the Politics of Identity
46
Chapter 4 How Do We Get Out of This Capitalist Place?
72
Chapter 5 The Economy Stupid Industrial Policy Discourse and the Body Economic
92
Chapter 6 Querying Globalization
120
Chapter 7 PostFordism as Politics
148
Chapter 8 Toward a New Class Politics of Distribution
174
Chapter 9 Hewers of Cake and Drawers of Tea
206
Ghosts on a Blackboard
238
Chapter 11 Waiting for the Revolution
251
Bibliography
266
Index
286
Copyright

Other editions - View all

Common terms and phrases

Popular passages

Page xvii - The conclusion would be that the political, ethical, social, philosophical problem of our days is not to try to liberate the individual from the state, and from the state's institutions, but to liberate us both from the state and from the type of individualization which is linked to the state. We have to promote new forms of subjectivity through the refusal of this kind of individuality which has been imposed on us for several centuries.
Page xvi - ... double bind', which is the simultaneous individualization and totalization of modern power structures. The conclusion would be that the political, ethical, social, philosophical problem of our days is not to try to liberate the individual from the state, and from the state's institutions, but to liberate us both from the state and from the type of individualization which is linked to the state.

Bibliographic information