Science Under Siege: The Myth of Objectivity in Scientific ResearchA critique of the design and practice of contemporary scientific research which argues that science is shaped by the vested interests it serves and by the society that supports it. |
Contents
Franklin | 11 |
Science under Pressure | 19 |
Science at Risk | 33 |
Copyright | |
7 other sections not shown
Common terms and phrases
administration allegations analysis assumptions authors BALB/c bias Biology blood lead blood-lead levels Brain Sciences Canadian cancer CBC Radio Cell Cultures Chapter Charles River chemicals Chromosomes Chubin co-authored Cole conclusions contamination corporate Darsee David Horrobin editors environmental established evidence example experimental experiments favour field findings fraud gasoline lead genes genetic Globe and Mail granting committees Health Department Human Values hypotheses ideas important individual industrial Institutes of Health involved John Darsee journals Kahan laboratory lead levels Leo Szilard Louis Siminovitch Love Canal manuscript Mark Gable McGill NHANES Paigen papers Peer Review personal communication Pirkle political potential practice problems procedures produce proposals published referees reported research funds Rustum Roy samples scientific investigations scientific research Scott Armstrong senior scientist social Spandidos Stephen Cole Stephen Jay Gould Stevan Harnad Technology and Human tests theories Toronto University vested interests W.A. Nelson-Rees Walter Nelson-Rees York