Challenging Postmodernism: Philosophy and the Politics of Truth
According to proponents of postmodernism, one of the principal achievements of recent Continental philosophy is the rejection of the idea of "objective truth" in favor of the notion that truth is a social construct, which varies from one culture to another. This claim has given rise to heated reactions among philosophers of the Anglo-American analytic school. Their criticisms usually take the form of wholesale dismissals, which do not address the texts and arguments of postmodernists, and they almost always stem from a politically conservative vantage point, which is hostile to the generally leftist orientation of postmodernists. As a result, philosophical differences are frequently obscured by the conflict arising from differing political agendas.
In this accessible, nontechnical discussion of the controversies surrounding the ideas of truth, philosopher David Detmer faults both the critics of postmodernism for entangling the philosophical discussion of truth with their disapproval of postmodernist political views, and the postmodernist critics of objective truth for the defective logic and incoherence of their critique. Unlike most analytic philosophers, Detmer engages extensively and directly with the texts of postmodernists. He provides substantial discussions of Husserl, Sartre, Rorty, and Chomsky, and also addresses the topics of journalistic objectivity, scientific truth, political correctness, and other timely issues. While sympathetic to Continental philosophy, Detmer nonetheless defends the idea of objective truth and attempts to show that doing so is a matter of considerable political importance.
Detmer's thorough and lucid discussion will appeal to anyone who finds the postmodern rejection of objectivity and truth dubious and who is yet uncomfortable with the highly conservative political rhetoric of the loudest voices in the anti-postmodernist crowd.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
American Anderson anti-foundationalism antiscience argue argument assertion attempt beliefs bias chapter Chomsky's claim consensus contingent coverage criticism culture defend Dinesh D'Souza disagreement discussion El Salvador epistemic epistemology ethical evidence example fact fallacy false false dilemma giraffes giraffes are taller historical hoax human rights Husserl Ibid ical idea Iran Iraq issues Jean-Paul Sartre journalists judgments knowledge law of non-contradiction liberal logic mainstream matter means ment moral Moreover murder Nicaragua Nightline Noam Chomsky objective truth opinion particular perhaps perspective Philosophy political position possible postmodern postmodernists problem question rational reality reason regard reject relative relativism relativist relevant response Richard Rorty Rorty Rorty's Sarchett Sartre Sartre's seems self-referential inconsistency sense simply Simpson skepticism Smith social constructionism socially constructed Sokal Sokal Hoax statement story taller than ants theory thesis things tion true U.S. government U.S. mass media understanding University Press validity values wrong York