Assisted Death: A Study in Ethics and Law
Ethical and legal issues concerning physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia are very much on the public agenda in many jurisdictions. In this timely book L.W. Sumner addresses these issues within the wider context of palliative care for patients in the dying process. His ethical conclusion is that a bright line between assisted death and other widely accepted end-of-life practices, including the withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment, pain control through high-dose opioids, and terminal sedation, cannot be justified. In the course of the ethical argument many familiar themes are given careful and thorough treatment: conceptions of death, the badness of death, the wrongness of killing, informed consent and refusal, the ethics of suicide, cause of death, the double effect, the sanctity of life, the 'active/passive' distinction, advance directives, and nonvoluntary euthanasia. The legal discussion opens with a survey of some prominent prohibitionist and regulatory regimes and then outlines a model regulatory policy for assisted death. Sumner concludes by defending this policy against a wide range of common objections, including those which appeal to slippery slopes or the possibility of abuse, and by asking how the transition to a regulatory regime might be managed in three common law prohibitionist jurisdictions.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
administered advance directives analgesics Anita and Bill Anita’s death argued argument assisted death assisted suicide autonomy best interest cancer capable cause of death cent concerning condition consequentialist Court criminal critical interests Cruzan decisional capacity disability discussion distinction doctors doses Down’s Dutch duty dying process end-of-life measures ethical euthanasia and assisted euthanasia or assisted experiential interests favour feeding tube Finnis further harm hasten death healthcare providers impermissible infants informed consent intended issue jurisdictions justified killing least life-sustaining treatment Margo means Model Policy Nancy Cruzan Netherlands nonvoluntary euthanasia normative nutrition and hydration one’s opioids Oregon pain palliative palliative care patient’s patient’s death person physician physician-assisted suicide practice prosecution question reason refusal of treatment regime request require respect result scenarios standard substitute decision-makers substituted judgement Sue Rodriguez suffering terminal sedation treatment decisions treatment options treatment refusal unconscious ventilator voluntary euthanasia well-being withholding or withdrawing