The Jesus Legend: A Case for the Historical Reliability of the Synoptic Jesus Tradition
Even mature Christians have trouble defending the person and divinity of Christ. The Jesus Legend builds a convincing interdisciplinary case for the unique and plausible position of Jesus in human history. He was real and his presence on the planet has been well-documented.
The authors of the New Testament didn't plant evidence, though each writer did tell the truth from a unique perspective. This book carefully investigates the Gospel portraits of Jesus--particularly the Synoptic Gospels--assessing what is reliable history and fictional legend. The authors contend that a cumulative case for the general reliability of the Synoptic Gospels can be made and boldly challenge those who question the veracity of the Jesus found there.
What people are saying - Write a review
For every serious reader of gospel reliability!User Review - Christianbook.com
Great book! It is certainly one of the best of it's kind and anyone seriously interested in the topic should read it. It is fast becoming a very important work. It discusses methodological issues, refutes the claims of Jesus-myth proponents, skeptics who believe Jesus lived, but don't believe much can be known beyond that, defends extra Biblical references to Jesus, demolishes the arguments of the academic ethnocentric scholars that rule out the possibility of miracles, addresses genre and questions of canon, and a whole lot more. GET IT! Finally, I don't like doing this in a review of the book, but I have to address what the other reviewer said so that some people are not misled. I must say with as much respect as I can, I don't think his review is trustworthy. Here is why: He says this book is a rehash of the arguments in the works of N. Geisler, W.L. Craig, and McDowell. Hardly. First, Craig does not much of anything in the area of defending the historical reliability of the Gospels in general. This book does. Rather Craig focuses on defending certain claims about the Gospels that relate to the resurrection. This is why Craig's newest edition of Reasonable Faith does not contain a chapter on the reliability of the Gospels. In the second edition, he had a chapter on it, but Craig did not even write it, Blomberg did! In fact Craig, argued with the publishers because he did not want a chapter defending Gospel reliability! Boyd and Eddy's book refutes the Christ-myth. Where does Craig do a comparable job of this? Craig understandably ignores it since it is not an issue in the scholarly community. Craig does not ever go into the depths of defending extra Biblical sources the way this book does. Where does Craig give an extended refutation of the Christ-myth the way this book does? For that matter, where do Geisler and McDowell? They don't go into nearly the depth. And this is a major focus of Boyd and Eddy's book. How then could it be a rehash? It's not! I could go on ...
Review: The Jesus Legend: A Case for the Historical Reliability of the Synoptic Jesus TraditionUser Review - George Sr. - Goodreads
A spirited if somewhat prolix defense against the claim that the Gospels are fictitious. The authors, however, choose to defend only the Synoptic Gospels with very little mention of the Fourth Gospel ... Read full review