Economics--Mathematical Politics Or Science of Diminishing Returns?

Front Cover
University of Chicago Press, 1992 - Business & Economics - 266 pages
"Economics will never be able to move beyond these vague predictions because it treats human behavior - individual and social - as the product of expectations and preferences - beliefs and desires - the variables that cannot be measured independently of the actual choices we want to predict. These factors, combined with the economist's commitment to the search for equilibrium solutions to theoretical problems, condemn economic theory to permanent predictive weakness. In the end, Rosenberg's analysis is not merely a critique. His aim is to redefine the scope and value of neoclassical theory, suggesting that its character and most important accomplishments need to be correctly understood to defend economics against the charge that it is a science of diminishing returns."--BOOK JACKET.
 

Contents

CHAPTER
1
The mutual constraints of goals theories and rules
12
CHAPTER 2
21
CHAPTER 3
56
Neoclassical Economics as a Research Program
87
Research programs and the demarcation problem
96
Down the slippery slope to McCloskey
107
CHAPTER 6
152
Generic predictions and the temptation of biology
177
Darwin Friedman and Alchain
183
Equilibrium and information in evolution and economics
193
Conclusion
199
What needs explanation? Can general equilibrium theory
211
Are generic predictions enough after all?
224
Bibliography
255
Index
261

Beckers new theory of consumer choice
161
Can we naturalize information?
170

Other editions - View all

Common terms and phrases

About the author (1992)

Alex Rosenberg is the R. Taylor Cole Professor of Philosophy and Biology at Duke University and the author of many books, including Economics--Mathematical Politics or Science of Diminishing Returns? and Instrumental Biology, or The Disunity of Science, both published by the University of Chicago Press.

Bibliographic information