Jury nullification: the evolution of a doctrine

Front Cover
Carolina Academic Press, 1998 - Law - 311 pages
3 Reviews
Central to the history of trial by jury is the right of jurors to vote "not guilty" if the law is unjust or unjustly applied. When jurors acquit a factually guilty defendant, we say that the jury "nullified" the law. The Founding Fathers believed that juries in criminal trials had a role to play as the "conscience of the community," & relied on juries' "nullifying" to hold the government to the principles of the Constitution. Yet over the last century & a half, this power of jurors has been derided & ignored by American courts, to the point that today few jurors are aware that an important part of their role is, in the words of the Supreme Court, to "prevent oppression by the government."

From inside the book

What people are saying - Write a review

Review: Jury Nullification: The Evolution of a Doctrine

User Review  - Damian - Goodreads

Good comprehensive coverage, but preferred the US case law history which I found the most interesting. Skimmed much of the rest. Read full review

Review: Jury Nullification: The Evolution of a Doctrine

User Review  - Melissa - Goodreads

I got a jury summons a while ago (which was cancelled) and I want to know more about this topic in case I have to be on a jury sometime. Read full review

Related books

Contents

Chapter One Introduction
3
United States 283 U S 10th Cir 1990 269
8
Chapter Two The Origins of the Doctrine
13
Copyright

31 other sections not shown

Other editions - View all

Common terms and phrases

Bibliographic information