The Tragedy of American Compassion
Can a man be content with a piece of bread and some change tossed his way from a passerby? Today's modern welfare state expects he can. Those who control the money in our society think that giving a dollar at the train station and then appropriating a billion dollars for federal housing can cure the ails of the homeless and the poor. But the crisis of the modern welfare state is more than a crisis of government. Private charities that dispense aid indiscriminately while ignoring the moral and spiritual needs of the poor are also to blame. Like animals in the zoo at feeding time, the needy are given a plate of food but rarely receive the love and time that only a person can give. Poverty fighters 100 years ago were more compassionate--in the literal meaning of "suffering with"--than many of us are now. They opened their own homes to deserted women and children. They offered employment to nomadic men who had abandoned hope and human contact. Most significantly, they made moral demands on recipients of aid. They saw family, work, freedom, and faith as central to our being, not as life-style options. No one was allowed to eat and run. Some kind of honest labor was required of those who needed food or a place to sleep in return. Woodyards next to homeless shelters were as common in the 1890's as liquor stores are in the 1990's. When an able bodied woman sought relief, she was given a seat in the "sewing room" and asked to work on garments given to the helpless poor. To begin where poverty fighters a century ago began, Marvin Olasky emphasizes seven ideas that recent welfare practice has put aside: affiliation, bonding, categorization, discernment, employment, freedom, and most importantly, belief in God. In the end, not much will be accomplished without a spiritual revival that transforms the everyday advice we give and receive, and the way we lead our lives. It's time we realized that there is only so much that public policy can do. That only a richness of spirit can battle a poverty of soul. The century-old question--does any given scheme of help...make great demands on men to give themselves to their brethren?--is still the right one to ask. Most of our 20th-century schemes have failed. It's time to learn from the warm hearts and hard heads of the 19th-century.
What people are saying - Write a review
Review: The Tragedy of American CompassionUser Review - Stuart Spitalnic - Goodreads
Dull, repetitive, and no secrets. Agree with ideas that the nation's charity cases were better off before government made an industry out of welfare. Unearned benefits and entitlements breed senses of entitlement and are self perpetuating and magnifying. Read full review
Review: The Tragedy of American CompassionUser Review - Mic - Goodreads
This book has no data to support his claims, rendering it into a very long opinion piece, lifestyle preference over policy suggestions. Yet it's treated as the latter. The first few chapters are ... Read full review
The Religions Next Door: What We Need to Know about Judaism, Hinduism ...
Limited preview - 2004
THE EARLY AMERICAN MODEL OF COMPASSION
TURNING CITIES INTO COUNTRYSIDE
FIRST CHALLENGE TO THE CHARITY CONSENSUS
THE SOCIAL DARWINIST THREAT
PROVING SOCIAL DARWINISM WRONG
THE SEVEN MARKS OF COMPASSION
AND WHY NOT DO MORE?
EXCITEMENT OF A NEW CENTURY
Loose Connections: Joining Together in America's Fragmented Communities
No preview available - 2002
Legitimacy in Public Administration: A Discourse Analysis
O. C. McSwite
Limited preview - 1997